From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RZ5od-0005yn-Tr for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:09:05 +0100 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Dec 2011 11:01:50 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="100576554" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.13.9]) ([10.255.13.9]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Dec 2011 11:01:50 -0800 Message-ID: <4EE25B1E.1060603@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:01:50 -0800 From: Joshua Lock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111115 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <234071f22c2183ea28cda55bac8f68cb47e8f0e1.1322607016.git.sgw@linux.intel.com> <1323456167.25802.5.camel@mattotaupa> <4EE25863.20906@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <4EE25863.20906@windriver.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/26] xinit: Update to 1.3.1 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:09:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 09/12/11 10:50, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 12/9/11 12:42 PM, Paul Menzel wrote: >> Dear Saul, >> >> >> Am Dienstag, den 29.11.2011, 15:00 -0800 schrieb Saul Wold: >>> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold >>> --- >>> .../xorg-app/{xinit_1.3.0.bb => xinit_1.3.1.bb} | 6 +++--- >>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> rename meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/{xinit_1.3.0.bb => >>> xinit_1.3.1.bb} (80%) >>> >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xinit_1.3.0.bb >>> b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xinit_1.3.1.bb >>> similarity index 80% >>> rename from meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xinit_1.3.0.bb >>> rename to meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xinit_1.3.1.bb >>> index 08dfe12..2ddebe6 100644 >>> --- a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xinit_1.3.0.bb >>> +++ b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xinit_1.3.1.bb >>> @@ -13,11 +13,11 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = >>> "file://COPYING;md5=0d4b5eef75f1584ccbdc5e4a34314407" >>> PR = "r2" >> >> when upgrading recipes please remember to reset `PR` to 0. I just >> spotted that now when looking through the “recent” changes [1]. > > I have not been doing that. When I asked a while back the response I > got was mixed and what I took from it is that PR (on a package upgrade) > is up to the discretion of the person performing the upgrade. > > If reseting to 0 is/should be the official policy, then we really need > to document it as part of the patch/update guidelines.. My understanding is that the differing of opinion is between: a) setting the PR = "0" in the recipe b) deleting the PR entry from the recipe Both of which set PR to 0, which I always understood to be 'policy' unless there's a reason not to (usually meta-oe compatibility) but each have their proponents for what makes most sense. Regards, Joshua -- Joshua Lock Yocto Project "Johannes factotum" Intel Open Source Technology Centre