From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RZ60q-0006V0-K2 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:21:41 +0100 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Dec 2011 11:14:48 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,352,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="84795270" Received: from unknown (HELO envy.home) ([10.255.12.30]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Dec 2011 11:14:48 -0800 Message-ID: <4EE25E38.3060704@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:15:04 -0800 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110927 Thunderbird/7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dosfstools: update native to 2.11 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:21:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/08/2011 07:40 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > This unify recipes for target and native builds and also drops the the > already merged patches. > > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador > --- > .../dosfstools/dosfstools-native_2.10.bb | 19 ----- > .../dosfstools/dosfstools/2.6.20-syscall.patch | 72 ------------------- > .../dosfstools/dosfstools-2.10-kernel-2.6.patch | 74 -------------------- > .../dosfstools/dosfstools/mkdosfs-bootcode.patch | 68 ++++++++---------- > .../dosfstools/dosfstools/mkdosfs-dir.patch | 62 ++++++++--------- > .../recipes-devtools/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.10.bb | 24 ------ > .../recipes-devtools/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11.bb | 11 ++- > 7 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 261 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/dosfstools/dosfstools-native_2.10.bb > delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/dosfstools/dosfstools/2.6.20-syscall.patch > delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/dosfstools/dosfstools/dosfstools-2.10-kernel-2.6.patch > delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.10.bb > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/dosfstools/dosfstools/2.6.20-syscall.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/dosfstools/dosfstools/2.6.20-syscall.patch > deleted file mode 100644 > index 4460f06..0000000 > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/dosfstools/dosfstools/2.6.20-syscall.patch > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1,72 +0,0 @@ > -Only use the system's llseek(). > - > -Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [licensing] > -We're tracking an old release of dosfstools due to licensing issues. What are these licensing issues, and are they no longer an issue? -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel