From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RZ6Uc-0007dP-2C for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:52:26 +0100 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Dec 2011 11:45:34 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="84120905" Received: from unknown (HELO envy.home) ([10.255.12.30]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Dec 2011 11:45:33 -0800 Message-ID: <4EE2656D.7090706@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:45:49 -0800 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110927 Thunderbird/7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] scripts/send-pull-request: allow sending of patches without a cover letter X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:52:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/09/2011 11:36 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 17:34, Khem Raj > wrote: > > why do you want to avoid cover letter ? or is it for other layers > other than oe-core > > > When it is a single patch makes no sense to send a cover letter that > most of time we just write the same of first commit. Well, you could just use git-send-email when there is only 1 patch. I had considered having the tool create only a single email if there was only 1 patch. However, in the end, I just send the cover letter with the pull requrest and let the single patch follow. It works fine and is consistent with the other patches, even if it is a degenerate case. So I don't think this is necessary really, but if it works for you and doesn't get abused, I'm fine with it. Perhaps only allowing this if there is indeed only 1 patch would be better. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel