From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RbcfW-00005u-IA for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:38:06 +0100 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Dec 2011 10:31:06 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,352,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="87375678" Received: from unknown (HELO envy.home) ([10.255.12.232]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Dec 2011 10:31:06 -0800 Message-ID: <4EEB8E58.3030806@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:30:48 -0800 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110927 Thunderbird/7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 Subject: Can we drop eglibc-utils from LIBC_DEPENDENCIES? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:38:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm working on a minimal distro definition, and found that eglibc-utils pulls in bash (needed for tzconfig and xtrace apparently) which pulls in gettext, which requires wchar support. I'd like to remove eglibc-utils from my distro definition. I could override the default I suspect, but I wonder if eglibc-utils should be made an optional package that distro definitions, images, or users should specifically add if needed? The relevant bit of code appears to be: meta/conf/distro/include/tclibc-eglibc.inc LIBC_DEPENDENCIES = "libsegfault \ eglibc \ eglibc-dbg \ eglibc-dev \ eglibc-utils \ eglibc-thread-db \ eglibc-localedata-i18n \ eglibc-gconv-ibm850 \ eglibc-gconv-cp1252 \ eglibc-gconv-iso8859-1 \ eglibc-gconv-iso8859-15 \ locale-base-en-us \ locale-base-en-gb " eglibc-dbg and eglibc-dev also seem like they could be made optional. Thoughts? Would anyone object to me removing at least eglibc-utils from LIBC_DEPENDENCIES? -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel