From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rchw4-00036t-Mj for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:27:40 +0100 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Dec 2011 10:20:37 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="89173158" Received: from rmoore1-desk5.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.7.199.156]) ([10.7.199.156]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Dec 2011 10:20:37 -0800 Message-ID: <4EEF8073.2040205@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:20:35 -0800 From: Joshua Lock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111115 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <4EEBC476.20108@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4EEBC476.20108@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: UDEV-145?? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:27:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 16/12/11 14:21, Saul Wold wrote: > > Does anyone know why we might be keeping this older version around? I > know that in the past there were kernel <-> udev issues. Are most usages > now using current kernels and udev? I was wondering the same thing. I have a WIP patch series to drop the old version and the old inc file. Further I'd like to try and get meta-oe using at least most of the oe-core udev, I've not looked at the differences there yet. Joshua -- Joshua Lock Yocto Project "Johannes factotum" Intel Open Source Technology Centre