From: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] pango: clarify LICENSE is LGPL-2.0+
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:08:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EEFB5E1.7040204@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B87129-E8A1-4358-BA5A-7090EA679925@dominion.thruhere.net>
On 15/12/11 23:30, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 16 dec. 2011, om 00:30 heeft Joshua Lock het volgende geschreven:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango.inc | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango.inc b/meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango.inc
>> index ff5a73a..922425c 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango.inc
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango.inc
>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ core of text and font handling for GTK+-2.x."
>> HOMEPAGE = "http://www.pango.org/"
>> BUGTRACKER = "http://bugzilla.gnome.org"
>> SECTION = "libs"
>> -LICENSE = "LGPL"
>> +LICENSE = "LGPL-2.0+"
>
> In the past we agreed to use LGLPv2+ for that, has that changed?
My bad, I saw the modified license handling code was mapping to SPDX
values and opted to just do that. You're right though, current
convention is the v notation.
I've respun the patch series.
Cheers,
Joshua
--
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-19 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-15 23:30 [PATCH 00/10] Various license clarifications Joshua Lock
2011-12-15 23:30 ` [PATCH 01/10] gypsy: fix LICENSE field Joshua Lock
2011-12-15 23:30 ` [PATCH 02/10] udev: fix LICENSE fields to be SPDX compliant Joshua Lock
2011-12-16 7:36 ` Khem Raj
2011-12-19 18:48 ` Joshua Lock
2011-12-15 23:30 ` [PATCH 03/10] apt: clarify LICENSE as GPL-2.0 Joshua Lock
2011-12-15 23:30 ` [PATCH 04/10] dpkg: " Joshua Lock
2011-12-15 23:30 ` [PATCH 05/10] clutter: clarify LICENSE as LGPL-2.1 Joshua Lock
2011-12-15 23:30 ` [PATCH 06/10] cogl: clarify LICENSE as LGPL-2.1 and fix metadata Joshua Lock
2011-12-15 23:30 ` [PATCH 07/10] matchbox-wm: clarify LICENSE as GPL-2.0 Joshua Lock
2011-12-15 23:30 ` [PATCH 08/10] pango: clarify LICENSE is LGPL-2.0+ Joshua Lock
2011-12-16 7:30 ` Koen Kooi
2011-12-19 22:08 ` Joshua Lock [this message]
2011-12-15 23:30 ` [PATCH 09/10] matchbox-desktop: clarify LICENSE is GPL-2.0+ Joshua Lock
2011-12-15 23:30 ` [PATCH 10/10] matchbox-session-sato: clarify LICENSE in GPL-2.0 Joshua Lock
2011-12-21 17:18 ` [PATCH 00/10] Various license clarifications Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EEFB5E1.7040204@linux.intel.com \
--to=josh@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox