From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 7.mo4.mail-out.ovh.net ([178.33.253.54] helo=mo4.mail-out.ovh.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RcudR-0003T3-Fk for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:01:17 +0100 Received: from mail97.ha.ovh.net (b7.ovh.net [213.186.33.57]) by mo4.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id F14171064735 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 07:36:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 20 Dec 2011 08:36:12 +0200 Received: from cug31-2-82-228-86-110.fbx.proxad.net (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) (ebenard%eukrea.com@82.228.86.110) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 20 Dec 2011 08:36:11 +0200 Message-ID: <4EF02CDA.8070707@eukrea.com> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 07:36:10 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9nard?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer X-Ovh-Mailout: 178.32.228.4 (mo4.mail-out.ovh.net) References: <1323851280-6342-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <1323856946.25491.31.camel@ted> <4EE8E607.5080207@emagii.com> In-Reply-To: X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 3232177158678359490 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.228.86.110 (cug31-2-82-228-86-110.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-OVH-SPAMSTATE: OK X-OVH-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-OVH-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeefkedrtdefucetggdotefuucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepkfffhfgfggfvufhfjggtgfesthekrgdttdefudenucfhrhhomhepgfhrihgtpgeurohnrghrugcuoegvrhhitgesvghukhhrvggrrdgtohhmqeenucffohhmrghinhepne X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeefjedruddvucetggdotefuucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepkfffhfgfggfvufhfjggtgfesthekrgdttdefudenucfhrhhomhepgfhrihgtpgeurohnrghrugcuoegvrhhitgesvghukhhrvggrrdgtohhmqeenucffohhmrghinhepne Cc: ulf@emagii.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc-4.6: Let G++ relocate gxx-include-dir when using --sysroot option X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:01:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Khem, Le 14/12/2011 19:38, Khem Raj a =E9crit : > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Ulf Samuelsson > wrote: >>> >>> >> Not familiar with gcc internals, but just want to reiterate the point >> that the problem occured (the one I saw) only when I had >> BB_NUMBER_THREADS at a high value, so WHEN things are done seems to be >> important. > Seems more complicated than this. A customeer reproduced it with BB_THREA= D=3D2 and PARALLEL=3Dj3 ... (I never reproduced in with BB_THREAD < 5) > could you test out this patch in your configuration and see if you stil= l > see the problem ? > I reproduced the problem with this patch and BB_THREAD=3D8 so this patch = doesn't improve the current behaviour. Eric