Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] [RESEND]Create a script for SUMMARY audit in recipes
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 21:45:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EF17275.6080202@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1324441819.git.shane.wang@intel.com>

On 12/20/2011 08:32 PM, Shane Wang wrote:
> Here is the script to check which recipe provides SUMMARY and which doesnot.
> For those which do not, maintainer should add or update to a meaningful summary for HOB to display in description.
>
Shane,

I guess I am not understanding why this is needed.  Why can't we use 
DESCRIPTION which is a required entry?  Use the first X Characters of 
DESCRIPTION?

Sau!


> The following changes since commit b281fd127bac9ba77ab63a5c2b812ddd5d56df37:
>
>    documentation/poky-ref-manual/technical-details.xml: edits per Richard Purdie (2011-12-16 16:58:41 +0000)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>    git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib shane/summary-audit
>    http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=shane/summary-audit
>
> Shane Wang (1):
>    Create a script for SUMMARY audit in recipes
>
>   scripts/contrib/summary-audit.sh |   55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100755 scripts/contrib/summary-audit.sh
>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-12-21  5:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-21  4:32 [PATCH 0/1] [RESEND]Create a script for SUMMARY audit in recipes Shane Wang
2011-12-21  4:32 ` [PATCH 1/1] Create " Shane Wang
2011-12-21  5:45 ` Saul Wold [this message]
2011-12-21  6:10   ` [PATCH 0/1] [RESEND]Create " Wang, Shane
2011-12-21 18:16     ` Joshua Lock
2011-12-21 18:43       ` Saul Wold
2011-12-21 18:59         ` Mark Hatle
2011-12-22 10:17           ` Paul Eggleton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EF17275.6080202@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox