From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.2]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RdNC2-0002tC-0m for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:30:54 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.15] (unknown [82.240.38.71]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7AE4B051E; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:23:46 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4EF1EBF1.4090509@eukrea.com> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:23:45 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?RXJpYyBCw6luYXJk?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Khem Raj References: <1323851280-6342-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <1323856946.25491.31.camel@ted> <4EE8E607.5080207@emagii.com> <4EF02CDA.8070707@eukrea.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: ulf@emagii.com, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc-4.6: Let G++ relocate gxx-include-dir when using --sysroot option X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:30:54 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Khem, Le 20/12/2011 20:59, Khem Raj a =C3=A9crit : > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Eric B=C3=A9nard wr= ote: >> Hi, Khem, >> >> Le 14/12/2011 19:38, Khem Raj a =C3=A9crit : >> >>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Ulf Samuelsson >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Not familiar with gcc internals, but just want to reiterate the >>>> point that the problem occured (the one I saw) only when I had >>>> BB_NUMBER_THREADS at a high value, so WHEN things are done seems to >>>> be important. >>> >>> >> Seems more complicated than this. A customeer reproduced it with >> BB_THREAD=3D2 and PARALLEL=3Dj3 ... (I never reproduced in with BB_THR= EAD< >> 5) >> > > Can you see when gcc-runtime was finished building and staging w.r.t to= the > failing app > rm_work on gcc-runtime was done far before do_configure on the failing ap= p (mysql in the present case). Eric