From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] misc fixes
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:27:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EF384A3.1020501@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1324495514.git.nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
On 12/21/2011 11:27 AM, nitin.a.kamble@intel.com wrote:
> From: Nitin A Kamble<nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
>
> Here are few misc fixes for oecore.
>
> Thanks,
> Nitin
>
> The following changes since commit dee0fc1462ba18551571c3b2d0f2b443a2feca18:
>
> multilib.conf: Enable shadow-sysroot and libffi (2011-12-21 17:24:44 +0000)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
> git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib nitin/misc
> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=nitin/misc
>
> H.J. Lu (1):
> gmp: Don't check "$CC $CFLAGS" for x32 in gmp configure
>
Pulled into OE-Core
> Nitin A Kamble (2):
> bitbake.conf multilib.conf: move the definition of baselib
This requires more information based on RP's Comment:
"this is a major layout change for x86-64 but Nitin makes no comment
on that in the commit"
> binutils: fix building on distros with matching binutils version
>
Merged the binutils patch to OE-Core
> meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 2 +-
> meta/conf/multilib.conf | 2 -
> .../binutils/binutils-cross-canadian_2.22.bb | 2 +-
> .../binutils/binutils-crosssdk_2.22.bb | 2 +-
> meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc | 2 +-
> meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.22.bb | 2 +-
> meta/recipes-support/gmp/gmp/gmp_fix_for_x32.patch | 24 ++++++++-----------
> 7 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-22 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-21 19:27 [PATCH 0/3] misc fixes nitin.a.kamble
2011-12-21 19:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] gmp: Don't check "$CC $CFLAGS" for x32 in gmp configure nitin.a.kamble
2011-12-21 19:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] bitbake.conf multilib.conf: move the definition of baselib nitin.a.kamble
2011-12-21 19:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] binutils: fix building on distros with matching binutils version nitin.a.kamble
2011-12-21 22:41 ` Martin Jansa
2011-12-22 16:27 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-12-22 19:27 ` Saul Wold [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-06-18 3:54 [PATCH 0/3] Misc fixes Paul Eggleton
2018-09-03 21:25 Khem Raj
2018-09-10 11:13 ` Burton, Ross
2018-09-10 16:06 ` Khem Raj
2018-08-27 6:51 [PATCH 0/3] Misc Fixes Khem Raj
2016-07-20 19:38 [PATCH 0/3] Misc fixes Khem Raj
2015-10-12 13:49 Paul Eggleton
2012-03-30 22:28 [PATCH 0/3] Misc Fixes nitin.a.kamble
2011-11-04 17:52 [PATCH 0/3] Misc fixes Paul Eggleton
2011-11-07 17:42 ` Saul Wold
2011-05-13 12:54 Martin Jansa
2011-05-17 18:35 ` Saul Wold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EF384A3.1020501@linux.intel.com \
--to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox