From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.dream-property.net ([82.149.226.172]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Riy3n-0000vH-U9 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 01:53:32 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dream-property.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1351E31577D0 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 01:39:30 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.dream-property.net Received: from mail.dream-property.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.dream-property.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id HA9xKRv60j61 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 01:39:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from [172.22.22.61] (drms-590c57d9.pool.mediaWays.net [89.12.87.217]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.dream-property.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9EE4931577CD for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 01:39:23 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F0642B9.20104@opendreambox.org> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 01:39:21 +0100 From: Andreas Oberritter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <1325799041-3640-1-git-send-email-andrei@gherzan.ro> In-Reply-To: <1325799041-3640-1-git-send-email-andrei@gherzan.ro> Subject: Re: [PATCH] wpa-supplicant: Compile without CONFIG_GNUTLS_EXTRA X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:53:32 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05.01.2012 22:30, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > From: Andrei Gherzan > > CONFIG_GNUTLS_EXTRA is needed as support for TLS/IA which was designed to be used > in the EAP-TTLSv1. As we don't see any requirement for that protocol today we decided > to remove it from wpa-supplicant .config file. With this option removed, is there any reason to prefer GnuTLS over OpenSSL? OpenSSL is wpa-supplicant's default, and at least Ubuntu uses OpenSSL with it, too. I guess it's tested more thoroughly than GnuTLS. Regards, Andreas