From: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
To: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] V2 Incremental image generation(rpm based rootfs)
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:40:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F0C1593.90203@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1325863359.20759.127.camel@ted>
Hi Richard,
Please see my comments inline ...
On 01/06/2012 11:22 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-12-31 at 16:10 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
>> Incremental image generation, the rootfs would be totally removed and
>> re-created in the second generation by default, but with INC_IMAGE_GEN =
>> "1", the rootfs would be kept, and will do update(remove/add some pkgs)
>> on it.
>> it.
>>
>> This only for the rpm based rootfs, I don't know whether we also need
>> this for ipk or deb based rootfs.
>
> As Koen points out, this should be called INC_RPM_IMAGE_GEN since it
> only works for rpm at present. It would be good to make this work on the
> other package backends. If we keep the generic variable name, the other
> package backends could error out saying they don't support it.
>
I did a rough investigation on deb these days, it seems not easy to do in
M2, so I'd like to make it work for both deb and ipk in M3. I will change the
name to INC_RPM_IMAGE_GEN at present, and send a V3 sooner.
>> [YOCTO #1651]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Yang<liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
>> ---
>> +
>> + # Attempt to remove unwanted pkgs, the scripts(pre, post, etc.) has not
>> + # been run by now, so don't have to run them(preun, postun, etc.) when
>> + # erase the pkg
>
> Really? I'd have thought it possible the scripts have run during the
> previous do_rootfs?
>
Yes, I think so, I think these post scripts are put in /etc/rpm-postinsts/,
and will be run when the system starts at the first time. The best solution
is that remove the script when "rpm -e", but it is hard to know which pkg
owns which script, so I just prevent running the preun and postun when
"rpm -e", I think this is acceptable since the INC_RPM_IMAGE_GEN is not
suggested in the productive rootfs.
// Robert
> Otherwise the patch looks reasonable to me.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-10 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-31 8:10 [PATCH 0/2] V2 Incremental image generation(rpm based rootfs) Robert Yang
2011-12-31 8:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Robert Yang
2011-12-31 8:48 ` Koen Kooi
2012-01-06 15:22 ` Richard Purdie
2012-01-10 10:40 ` Robert Yang [this message]
2011-12-31 8:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] V2 Incremental image generation(Add config sample) Robert Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F0C1593.90203@windriver.com \
--to=liezhi.yang@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox