From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [CONSOLIDATED PULL 0/5] final items for M2 RC1
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:45:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F0DBCBC.2070007@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1326278405.23315.16.camel@ted>
On 01/11/2012 02:40 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 23:36 -0800, Saul Wold wrote:
>> Richard,
>>
>> Here are the final items we discussed yesterday, a succesful
>> build finished, and we seem to be in good shape, please pull
>> these early in your day and fire up AB Master is you can.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sau!
>>
>>
>> The following changes since commit 9b944ae2f0e4dbac5a8f1f235f60730e56b26516:
>>
>> Revert "site/common-uclibc: Cache gl_cv_func_wcwidth_works" (2012-01-10 18:32:16 +0000)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>> git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib sgw/stage
>> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=sgw/stage
>>
>> Lianhao Lu (2):
>> meta/PRService: Added export/import fuctions.
>> package.bbclass: per recipe PRSERV_HOST support
>>
>> Robert Yang (2):
>> Incremental rpm image generation
>> Incremental rpm image generation(Add config sample)
>
> I merged these, thanks.
>
>> Shane Wang (1):
>> hdparm: upgrade to 9.37
>
> This one needs to be split up as Paul points out...
>
Ok, but one question about bisect-ability, if they are split and the
hdparm is in one side of a bisect without the new stat package, doesn't
that break the bisect ability "rule"?
Sau!
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-11 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-11 7:36 [CONSOLIDATED PULL 0/5] final items for M2 RC1 Saul Wold
2012-01-11 7:36 ` [CONSOLIDATED PULL 1/5] hdparm: upgrade to 9.37 Saul Wold
2012-01-11 9:38 ` Paul Menzel
2012-01-11 7:36 ` [CONSOLIDATED PULL 2/5] Incremental rpm image generation Saul Wold
2012-01-11 7:36 ` [CONSOLIDATED PULL 3/5] Incremental rpm image generation(Add config sample) Saul Wold
2012-01-11 7:36 ` [CONSOLIDATED PULL 4/5] meta/PRService: Added export/import fuctions Saul Wold
2012-01-11 7:36 ` [CONSOLIDATED PULL 5/5] package.bbclass: per recipe PRSERV_HOST support Saul Wold
2012-01-11 10:40 ` [CONSOLIDATED PULL 0/5] final items for M2 RC1 Richard Purdie
2012-01-11 16:45 ` Saul Wold [this message]
2012-01-11 17:07 ` Koen Kooi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F0DBCBC.2070007@linux.intel.com \
--to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox