From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RlTdM-0007VJ-Cj for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:37 +0100 Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2012 23:19:12 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="55739123" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.13.168]) ([10.255.13.168]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2012 23:19:12 -0800 Message-ID: <4F0E896F.8020107@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:19:11 -0800 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111115 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <1326285902-31525-1-git-send-email-andrei@gherzan.ro> <1356479.bsRlACIzx0@helios> <4F0D989D.4080907@gherzan.ro> In-Reply-To: <4F0D989D.4080907@gherzan.ro> Cc: Paul Eggleton Subject: Re: [PATCH] license.py: remove duplicate '&' or '|' from LICENSE X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:00:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/11/2012 06:11 AM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > On 01/11/2012 03:56 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: >> On Wednesday 11 January 2012 14:45:02 Andrei Gherzan wrote: >>> Some upstream layers (ex: meta-oe) use '&&' or '||' syntax in LICENSE >>> variable. Because of my last commit, these bbfiles are failing as >>> LICENSE >>> is tested with oe.license where '&&' and '||' are the bug source. >>> The fix is to replace multiple characters of '&' or '|' with a single >>> one. >> Sorry to be a pain but could we not just fix those layers to use the >> accepted >> syntax? Doing so should be just a one-line find/sed command. >> >> Cheers, >> Paul >> > That'd be a solution as well but because those files were accepted this > way until now i thought that this is an accepted syntax. More, this > would scale and give a little freedom to the developers especially for > those that are coming from "C" part or the world. (smile) > I think I agree with Paul here, Beth has sent out a proposal for that and by making a change here may allow the bad behavior to continue. Sau! > ag > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >