From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RpMsc-0001N6-Qq for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:36:27 +0100 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Jan 2012 08:28:41 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,352,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="99639041" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.14.82]) ([10.255.14.82]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Jan 2012 08:28:41 -0800 Message-ID: <4F1D8AB8.9000400@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:28:40 -0800 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111115 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <4236e557f38c0e4c3e7088fd528face5b74f60a8.1327123057.git.sgw@linux.intel.com> <1327264221.2859.2.camel@pb-ThinkPad-R50e> In-Reply-To: <1327264221.2859.2.camel@pb-ThinkPad-R50e> Cc: Phil Blundell Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/20] eglibc: refactor packages for staticdev X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:36:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/22/2012 12:30 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 21:18 -0800, Saul Wold wrote: >> @@ -54,6 +56,7 @@ RDEPENDS_${PN}-utils += "bash" >> FILES_${PN}-pcprofile = "${base_libdir}/libpcprofile.so" >> FILES_eglibc-thread-db${PKGSUFFIX} = "${base_libdir}/libthread_db.so.* ${base_libdir}/libthread_db-*.so" >> RPROVIDES_${PN}-dev += "libc-dev" >> +RPROVIDES_${PN}-dev += "libc-staticdev" > > Is that really what you wanted? > > More generally, I'm not very convinced that all these RPROVIDES in the > eglibc recipes are serving any useful purpose anymore. I think we > should be trying to get rid of them, not adding new ones. Does anybody > know of anything which currently depends on them? > Nothing in OE-Core, meta-oe or OE Classic seems to depend on these, but I thought part of that was the translation from eglibc to the generic "libc" Sau! > p. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >