From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] *** SUBJECT HERE ***
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:53:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F28E159.1020905@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOSpxdYr19UF+P-hUAVMe0Q6=UrMujSmLWS4QV3xMkPCP17SNA@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/31/2012 08:16 PM, Steve Sakoman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Did you send this using the send-pull-request script? I assume not as
>> this was to oe-core and not yocto, but if you did, I want to know as it
>> should protect against -ENOCOFFEEYET errors such as these.
>
> No, I used git send-email.
>
> I'm not familiar with the send-pull-request script. I wouldn't have
> guessed from the name that it is a mailing list patch submission
> script. Is it hardwired to the yocto list?
They are not hardwired for yocto. The name is a bit odd I admit. The
Yocto Project maintainers prefer to receive patches as pull requests as
well as a series of patches to the list. This makes review easy and
facilitates merging for them as well. The scripts create and send such
patches series.
>
>> For whatever it's worth, I use this script for all my projects now to
>> help avoid situations like this which I have fallen into more times than
>> I care to admit :-)
>
> Indeed, I very often catch myself forgetting to add the subject to the
> cover letter! I'll have to investigate using the send-pull-request
> script.
The scripts are in the poky repository under the scripts directory:
$ ls scripts/*pull-request
scripts/create-pull-request scripts/send-pull-request
--
Darren
>
> Steve
>
>> On 01/30/2012 09:17 AM, Steve Sakoman wrote:
>>> Sigh, my morning for screw-ups. Time for another cup of coffee . . .
>>>
>>> The subject should be: 'zypper: support signed repositories' rather
>>> than '***SUBJECT HERE***' :-)
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com> wrote:
>>>> The current zypper implementation does not work with signed repositories.
>>>> This patch series adds recipes for the required packages as well as the
>>>> necessary runtime dependencies to zypper.
>>>>
>>>> Tested on Gumstix Overo (OMAP3) with meta-openembedded layer enabled and
>>>> a systemd based console image.
>>>>
>>>> Version 3 incorporates feedback from Koen Kooi and Saul Wold
>>>> - adds runtime dependencies to existing RDEPENDS_${PN}
>>>> - removes duplicate recipe for libassuan
>>>> - moves recipes for gnupg and libksba to recipes-support
>>>>
>>>> Steve Sakoman (3):
>>>> libksba: add recipe for 1.2.0
>>>> gnupg: add recipe for 2.0.18
>>>> zypper: add missing runtime dependences on gzip and gnupg
>>>>
>>>> meta/recipes-extended/zypper/zypper_git.bb | 4 ++--
>>>> meta/recipes-support/gnupg/gnupg_2.0.18.bb | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> meta/recipes-support/libksba/libksba_1.2.0.bb | 10 ++++++++++
>>>> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/gnupg/gnupg_2.0.18.bb
>>>> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libksba/libksba_1.2.0.bb
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>> --
>> Darren Hart
>> Intel Open Source Technology Center
>> Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-01 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-30 17:14 [PATCH v3 0/3] *** SUBJECT HERE *** Steve Sakoman
2012-01-30 17:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] libksba: add recipe for 1.2.0 Steve Sakoman
2012-01-30 17:14 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] gnupg: add recipe for 2.0.18 Steve Sakoman
2012-01-30 20:09 ` Anders Darander
2012-01-30 20:29 ` Steve Sakoman
2012-01-30 17:14 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] zypper: add missing runtime dependences on gzip and gnupg Steve Sakoman
2012-01-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] *** SUBJECT HERE *** Steve Sakoman
2012-01-31 19:28 ` Darren Hart
2012-02-01 4:16 ` Steve Sakoman
2012-02-01 5:28 ` Wang, Shane
2012-02-01 6:57 ` Darren Hart
2012-02-01 6:53 ` Darren Hart [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F28E159.1020905@linux.intel.com \
--to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=steve@sakoman.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox