Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] netbase: make netbase recipe MACHINE specific for all targets
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:59:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F2ADCF6.4030000@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4092F86B-459F-45ED-B7B1-1198B2D6A992@dominion.thruhere.net>

On 02/02/12 10:54, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 2 feb. 2012, om 19:51 heeft Joshua Lock het volgende geschreven:
>
>> Several BSP's are appending netbase to add MACHINE specific
>> networking functionality. Rather than BSP creators having to mark
>> netbase MACHINE specific just default to PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE_ARCH}"
>> in netbase.
>>
>> This shouldn't be a huge hit as netbase just copies files around.
>
> In the past OE would mark things machine specific if something in SRC_URI was fetched using overrides. So it this patches fixed netbase the 'old' mechanism is broken :(

This patch doesn't fix netbase, I just thought it would be simpler to 
make this change than ensure all BSP's use appropriate OVERRIDEs in 
their netbase bbappends - several I've seen don't.

Cheers,
Joshua
-- 
Joshua Lock
         Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
         Intel Open Source Technology Centre



  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-02 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-02 18:51 [PATCH 0/1] Force netbase to be MACHINE specific for all MACHINEs Joshua Lock
2012-02-02 18:51 ` [PATCH 1/1] netbase: make netbase recipe MACHINE specific for all targets Joshua Lock
2012-02-02 18:54   ` Koen Kooi
2012-02-02 18:59     ` Joshua Lock [this message]
2012-02-03 17:15       ` Darren Hart
2012-02-04 16:07         ` Koen Kooi
2012-02-06 18:33           ` Joshua Lock
2012-02-06 18:58             ` Koen Kooi
2012-02-06 19:37               ` Joshua Lock
2012-02-06 19:50                 ` Koen Kooi
2012-02-06 19:55                   ` Joshua Lock
2012-02-03 21:07       ` Khem Raj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F2ADCF6.4030000@linux.intel.com \
    --to=josh@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox