On 2012年02月06日 15:05, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 02:41:09PM +0800, Xiaofeng Yan wrote:
>> From: Xiaofeng Yan<xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com>
>>
>> The function "g_qsort_with_data" has two kinds of realization. One calls qsort_r
>> from libglib, the other realize itself. the realization method is controlled by macro "HAVE_QSORT_R".
>> qsort_r from libglib cause sort error. Add no-check-qsort_r.patch for fixing this problem.
>> This patch is to fix bug 1959. After this patch is merged into OE-core I will open a new bug to
>> track the reason why qsort_r report normally. For finishing lsb test in YOCTO 1.2 M3 this patch
>> is applied temporarily.
>>
>> Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git
>>    Branch: xiaofeng/1959
>>    Browse: http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=xiaofeng/1959
>>
>> Thanks,
>>      Xiaofeng Yan<xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com>
>> ---
> no-check-qsort_r.patch is the same as remove.test.for.qsort_r.patch from
> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=74f43e3b269c01dba7cd5215a8e825229bd5ecff
>
> which was later removed from glib-2.0-native in
> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=37579d7d74d127c90c1e078d05c5bf4ba0b3f755
>
> and later removed completely in
> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=812342e44e9e361a0fa93cfcfe65cf4dd6f2fb57
>
> Are you sure this patch is right fix? And no need to split adding patch
> itself and adding it to SRC_URI to 2 patches.
>
> Cheers,
>
Hi Martin Jansa,
I reviewed the above link, no-check-qsort_r.patch is  the same as 
remove.test.for.qsort_r.patch really. Please check attachment for the 
test program from LSB 4.1. I think we need this patch because it is an 
error really. LSB report the next information:

After sorting array, the 0-th element of array should be 1, but is 2
After sorting array, the 1-th element of array should be 2, but is 1
After sorting array, the 2-th element of array should be 3, but is 5
After sorting array, the 4-th element of array should be 5, but is 3


I can reuse this patch which was removed before if you think this is a 
bug. Do you any suggestion?

Compile this test program.
$ gcc -g `pkg-config --cflags glib-2.0` gobject_value_arrays.c -o 
gobject -lgobject-2.0