Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiaofeng Yan <xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com>
To: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [oe] Source Archiver Class
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:40:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F41EAD7.3030009@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F3EE848.80703@linux.intel.com>

On 2012年02月18日 07:52, Saul Wold wrote:
>
> Xiaofeng & Community:
>
> We had a chat with Chris Larson and Mark Hatle here at ELC.
>
> We focused this issue down to a fewer number of options that meet the 
> needs of the licenses.  Please review this and let us know if there 
> are any issues or concerns.
>
>
Hi Saul,

I comment my understanding as follow:
> Best Practices:
>  - Archive during build, we do not support nor recommend post archiving
>  - Original tarball and patches w/ordering file (maybe comment the
>    series), grab non-patch files also.
         for example:
         file://a.patch
         file://b.config.in
         we also archive b.config.in.
>  - Unless requesting configured sources, which will just be the
>    configured source tarball
>  - Grab temp as postfunc of do_package - latest logs via links & pid
>
        That means logs package include all of logs in temp. for example.
        You has described a following function we will realize at the 
previous email.
       3 - Original Source code & Patches & temp (scripts & logs)

        source codes and patches should be in the stage 
do_patch[postfunc] = " do_get_source"
        logs should be in the stage do_package[postfunc] = " do_get_logs"
        So logs file shouldn't be archived in do_patch[postfunc] = " 
do_get_logs"
        The logs in the stage of do_packge are more than do_patch.

> For sstate Builds (LATER):
>  - need to verify that fetch/patch/configure will get re-run for 
> archiving
>  - Add temp dir to sstate capture (without links)
>
> 3 Implementations classes
>  - Filter in oe/lib/license.py
>  - source_archive.bb
>    - archives tarballs to ${BP}/...
>    - reuse copyleft_compliance for patch handling
>  - srpm
>    - take output from above and create SRPM - (LATER)
>
We will do the archive  work according the license .  I will implement 
two functions, one is for left, the other for right.
> 2 Configuration classes
>  - uses prefunc/postfunc at correct place
>  - Original Tarball / Patches
>  - Post Configuration
>
We can define 8 classes to complete  8 kinds of archiving methods.  
every class will inherit archiver.bbclass.
and then realize do_stage[prefunc/postfunc] in this class.
stage include unpack, patch, configure, build package and so on.
for example. we want only to get original tarball, then we can define a 
bbclass named "source.bbclass"
source.bbclass:
   inherit archiver.bbclass
   do_unpack[postfunc] = " do_get_source"

if we want to get both original and patches tarball, then we can define 
bbclass names "source_patches.bbclass"
source_patches.bbclass
    inherit archiver.bbclass
    do_unpack[postfunc] = " do_get_source_patches"

> SOURCE_ARCHIVE_PACKAGE_TYPE = {tar, srpm}
> SOURCE_ARCHIVE_LOG = {True, False}
>
> Please let us know if you have any questions.
>
> Sau!
>
If my understanding don't meet your ideas, Please correct me.

Thanks for your help very much.

Thanks
Yan
> On 02/15/2012 05:19 PM, Xiaofeng Yan wrote:
>



  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-20  6:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-26 20:56 Source Archiver Class Saul Wold
     [not found] ` <4F24F672.5090107@linux.intel.com>
2012-02-13 10:41   ` [oe] " Xiaofeng Yan
2012-02-14 16:51     ` Saul Wold
2012-02-15 15:23       ` Saul Wold
2012-02-16  1:19         ` Xiaofeng Yan
2012-02-17 23:52           ` Saul Wold
2012-02-20  6:40             ` Xiaofeng Yan [this message]
2012-02-21 16:57               ` Saul Wold
2012-02-23  2:24                 ` Xiaofeng Yan
2012-02-23  2:41                   ` Chris Larson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F41EAD7.3030009@windriver.com \
    --to=xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=sgw@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox