From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.dream-property.net ([82.149.226.172]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S0iKD-0006kx-Vp for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:43:50 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dream-property.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F837315946E for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:35:30 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.dream-property.net Received: from mail.dream-property.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.dream-property.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id cOdfOp2Ws847 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:35:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from [172.22.22.61] (drms-590ed8a0.pool.mediaWays.net [89.14.216.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.dream-property.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B030315946A for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:35:23 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F46CD3A.9030603@opendreambox.org> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:35:22 +0100 From: Andreas Oberritter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core Subject: package version went backwards X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:43:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, the following message just appeared after adding a bbappend: ERROR: Package version for package sysvinit-inittab went backwards which would break package feeds from (0:2.88dsf-r6 to 0:2.88dsf-r6-dream1) Is this really true? I thought that anything appended to X would be a higher version than X. If it's true, for example because the dash has a special meaning, does anybody have a list of valid or invalid characters for PR? I guess I could simply omit the dash. I'm using abbreviated layer names as suffix in my bbappends, because it makes it easier to see whether the package was modified by my layer(s) than with PRINC. Regards, Andreas