From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S8ba2-0003f7-JR for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:08:46 +0100 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Mar 2012 10:59:57 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="140058654" Received: from unknown (HELO envy.home) ([10.255.12.16]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Mar 2012 10:59:57 -0700 Message-ID: <4F637F70.60606@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:59:12 -0700 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120209 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <5ca651eb19c3fcb64de2ce405de0bc7fa2a8c90b.1331848750.git.dvhart@linux.intel.com> <4F635D37.2020406@linux.intel.com> <4F636283.7040800@linux.intel.com> <1331915160.18586.202.camel@ted> <4F636A2E.2090404@linux.intel.com> <1331917862.18586.210.camel@ted> In-Reply-To: <1331917862.18586.210.camel@ted> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rt-tests: Add src/backfire to FILES_${PN} X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:08:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/16/2012 10:11 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 09:28 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: >> >> On 03/16/2012 09:26 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 08:55 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: >>>> On 03/16/2012 08:33 AM, Darren Hart wrote: >>>>> Hrm, this silences the warnings, but the backfire sources are not >>>>> installed on the rootfs.... >>>>> >>>>> Anyone see what is wrong with the below? Is there some magic that purges >>>>> /usr/src in a minimal build? >>>> >>>> I was adding "/usr/src/backfire" to FILES_${PN}. It seems one should add >>>> "/usr/src/backfire/*" to actually get the files. >>>> >>>> However, I am surprised that the warnings went away and the files were >>>> still not packaged when I used "/usr/src/backfire". Is this expected >>>> behavior? >>>> >>>> I have pushed the new version to the same branch using >>>> "/usr/src/backfire/*". Built,booted,and verified on qemux86 using >>>> core-image-rt. >>> >>> FWIW with your original patch I'm seeing things being correctly packaged >>> in the main package (rt-tests) which is consistent with the warning >>> message being fixed. >> >> I see them appear in the rt-tests "package" dir, but not in the rootfs >> unless I append the "/*". > > If I view the contents of the rt-tests*.rpm in deploy/rpm/xxx/, I can > see the files listed. This is with current master. > > Please check what you tested ;-) > I can't explain it, but the one in master (no "/*") is working correctly per my last build. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel