From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Scott Garman <scott.a.garman@intel.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] shadow-native: disable logging to syslog
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 09:37:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F831047.40209@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F830CFE.8050703@intel.com>
On 04/09/2012 09:23 AM, Scott Garman wrote:
> On 04/09/2012 08:30 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
>> On 04/08/2012 10:00 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
>>> On 04/07/2012 04:59 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
>>>> On 04/05/2012 11:53 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> This pull request includes a patch to shadow to disable logging to
>>>>> syslog, to prevent sysroot user and group additions from writing
>>>>> entries to the host's syslog.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have build-tested this with core-image-sato (which builds a few
>>>>> useradd-based recipes, such as avahi and dbus) for all 5 of our
>>>>> qemu architectures, while watching my syslog to verify that no
>>>>> useradd or groupadd entries were written.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> With this patch applied, the following error was seen on the AB:
>>>>
>>>> | Running useradd commands...
>>>> | WARNING: useradd command did not succeed. Retrying...
>>>> | WARNING: useradd command did not succeed. Retrying...
>>>> | WARNING: useradd command did not succeed. Retrying...
>>>> | WARNING: useradd command did not succeed. Retrying...
>>>> | WARNING: useradd command did not succeed. Retrying...
>>>> | WARNING: useradd command did not succeed. Retrying...
>>>> | WARNING: useradd command did not succeed. Retrying...
>>>> | WARNING: useradd command did not succeed. Retrying...
>>>> | WARNING: useradd command did not succeed. Retrying...
>>>> | WARNING: useradd command did not succeed. Retrying...
>>>> | ERROR: tried running useradd command 10 times without success,
>>>> giving up
>>>>
>>>> Check the AB here:
>>>>
>>>> http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org:8010/builders/nightly-arm/builds/369/steps/shell_19/logs/stdio
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Saul,
>>>
>>> The syslog disable patch cannot trigger this error, I'm pretty certain
>>> you have encountered another problem.
>>>
>>> The useradd class now uses code which checks that the user account or
>>> group account was created in the passwd and group files, respectively.
>>> If the account was not created (which is verified via a grep command),
>>> the script sleeps for 1 second and tries again, up to 10 times. This is
>>> intended to avoid lockfile races, as useradd and groupadd lock the
>>> passwd and group files when creating accounts.
>>>
>>> It seems extremely unlikely that the passwd file was locked for a full
>>> 10s worth of attempts to access it. I also see from the logs that the
>>> base-passwd package was installed before this error was encountered,
>>> which *should* rule out the possibility that the useradd command was
>>> failing because /etc/passwd didn't exist yet.
>>>
>>> Later useradd commands are also failing in this manner, which makes me
>>> suspect that something is wrong with the /etc/passwd file in this image.
>>> The groupadd commands, on the other hand, are succeeding without any
>>> retries.
>>>
>>> So it would be helpful for me to know answers to the following:
>>>
>>> Was this a build from scratch or from sstate?
>>>
>> This was from sstate.
>>
>>> Is this problem reproducible? (I'm starting a build from scratch
>>> overnight on my end)
>>>
>> Only saw it on one build over the weekend, but turns out a bug already
>> existed with this issue, but it was filed as a PAM build failure (see
>> 2218) , which maybe I need to re-assign to you.
>
> Yes, I've re-assigned this bug to myself.
>
Ok thanks.
>>> What does the etc/passwd file in this image look like?
>>>
>> You can get it from the AB yourself, correct? If not, let me know please.
>
> This was a nightly build and it no longer appears to be on the server -
> assuming I'm connected to the correct one?
>
ab05, since this was a non-lsb build, the tmp dir you need to look at is
non-lsbtmp, it should be there, I just checked.
> Scott
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-09 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-06 6:53 [PATCH 0/1] shadow-native: disable logging to syslog Scott Garman
2012-04-06 6:53 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Scott Garman
2012-04-07 23:59 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Saul Wold
2012-04-09 5:00 ` Scott Garman
2012-04-09 15:30 ` Saul Wold
2012-04-09 16:23 ` Scott Garman
2012-04-09 16:37 ` Saul Wold [this message]
2012-04-09 14:28 ` Chris Larson
2012-04-10 15:29 ` Saul Wold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F831047.40209@linux.intel.com \
--to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=scott.a.garman@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox