From: Andreas Oberritter <obi@opendreambox.org>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] Fix update-alternatives and RPM package dependencies
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:20:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F8D51EF.3090005@opendreambox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62DAF410-1C09-4FE9-B049-35761619728C@dominion.thruhere.net>
On 17.04.2012 09:03, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 17 apr. 2012, om 00:45 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
>
>> It was recently noticed that many packages that use update-alternatives were
>> not setting package level provides. So a package that required /usr/bin/env
>> would not be satisfied by coreutils, even though it had a /usr/bin/env
>> alternative.
>
> Related to your patch: the upgrade paths for /usr/bin/watch are still broken because busybox still installs it into /bin/watch. I forget who was supposed to fix that, but it would be nice to get that done before the release.
Are you sure? Please take a look at
fa8b2d2bed63fa4fc2af45f094998b0f9e69d272. Is something wrong with this
patch?
Regards,
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-17 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-16 22:45 [PATCH 00/17] Fix update-alternatives and RPM package dependencies Mark Hatle
2012-04-16 22:45 ` [PATCH 01/17] update-alternatives.bbclass: Ensure alternatives end up in per file deps Mark Hatle
2012-04-17 8:43 ` Richard Purdie
2012-04-17 16:50 ` Mark Hatle
2012-04-16 22:45 ` [PATCH 02/17] coreutils_*.bb: Use update alternatives and add missing manual alt links Mark Hatle
2012-04-16 22:45 ` [PATCH 03/17] coreutils_*.bb: Sync up file path with busybox and minor cleanup Mark Hatle
2012-04-17 7:04 ` Koen Kooi
2012-04-17 7:22 ` Martin Jansa
2012-04-16 22:45 ` [PATCH 04/17] grep: Use update-alternatives Mark Hatle
2012-04-16 22:45 ` [PATCH 05/17] openssh: " Mark Hatle
2012-04-16 23:04 ` [PATCH 06/17] hdparm: " Mark Hatle
2012-04-16 23:05 ` [PATCH 07/17] iputils: " Mark Hatle
2012-04-16 23:15 ` [PATCH 08/17] net-tools: " Mark Hatle
2012-04-16 23:16 ` [PATCH 09/17] shadow: " Mark Hatle
2012-04-16 23:16 ` [PATCH 10/17] findutils: " Mark Hatle
2012-04-16 23:16 ` [PATCH 11/17] gzip: Use update-alternatives class Mark Hatle
2012-04-16 23:16 ` [PATCH 12/17] module-init-tools: Update to use " Mark Hatle
2012-04-16 23:16 ` [PATCH 13/17] kbd: Use update-alternatives Mark Hatle
2012-04-16 23:16 ` [PATCH 14/17] console-tools: " Mark Hatle
2012-04-16 23:16 ` [PATCH 15/17] sysvinit: Use update-alternatives in a different way Mark Hatle
2012-04-16 23:16 ` [PATCH 16/17] lrzsz: sz, sx and sb were linked incorrectly Mark Hatle
2012-04-17 17:03 ` FYI -- " Mark Hatle
2012-04-16 23:16 ` [PATCH 17/17] lrzsz: Use update-alternatives to set provides Mark Hatle
2012-04-17 7:03 ` [PATCH 00/17] Fix update-alternatives and RPM package dependencies Koen Kooi
2012-04-17 11:20 ` Andreas Oberritter [this message]
2012-04-27 21:25 ` Saul Wold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F8D51EF.3090005@opendreambox.org \
--to=obi@opendreambox.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox