From: Andreas Oberritter <obi@opendreambox.org>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: MIPS vs MIPS32 tunings -- summary and questions
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:45:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F8EA972.1090304@opendreambox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334749226.24091.67.camel@ted>
On 18.04.2012 13:40, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:30 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>> now, after having repacked all binary tarballs that had mipsel or
>> mipsel-nf in their name and contents, and after having changed all
>> occurrences of mipsel and mipsel-nf in my local recipes (where
>> appropriate), and after having rebuilt everything from scratch again, it
>> came to my attention that "mipsel" in PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS breaks opkg,
>> because no mipsel packages are being generated. That's what I told
>> before, right?
>
> How is this breaking opkg? We often have architectures listed in there
> for which there are no packages generated (all, noarch and any spring to
> mind)?
Downloading http://10.0.0.1/mipsel/Packages.gz.
wget: server returned error: HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
Collected errors:
* opkg_download: Failed to download http://10.0.0.1/mipsel/Packages.gz, wget returned 1.
Regards,
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-18 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-10 17:53 MIPS vs MIPS32 tunings -- summary and questions Mark Hatle
2012-04-10 19:28 ` Andreas Oberritter
2012-04-16 13:55 ` Andreas Oberritter
2012-04-16 14:37 ` Robert Yang
2012-04-16 15:23 ` Andreas Oberritter
2012-04-16 15:50 ` Richard Purdie
2012-04-16 14:42 ` Richard Purdie
2012-04-16 15:15 ` Andreas Oberritter
2012-04-16 15:30 ` Mark Hatle
2012-04-18 11:30 ` Andreas Oberritter
2012-04-18 11:40 ` Richard Purdie
2012-04-18 11:45 ` Andreas Oberritter [this message]
2012-04-18 11:53 ` Andreas Oberritter
2012-04-18 11:54 ` Martin Jansa
2012-04-18 12:00 ` Richard Purdie
2012-04-18 12:08 ` Andreas Oberritter
2012-04-18 12:45 ` Richard Purdie
2012-04-18 14:37 ` Andreas Oberritter
2012-04-18 15:21 ` Mark Hatle
2012-04-18 15:46 ` Martin Jansa
2012-04-18 17:01 ` Koen Kooi
2012-04-18 18:10 ` Andreas Oberritter
2012-04-18 18:31 ` Koen Kooi
2012-04-18 19:57 ` Martin Jansa
2012-04-18 12:15 ` Koen Kooi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F8EA972.1090304@opendreambox.org \
--to=obi@opendreambox.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox