From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SNsW6-0008Ll-3j for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 23:15:50 +0200 Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Apr 2012 14:06:10 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="93981447" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.12.123]) ([10.255.12.123]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Apr 2012 14:06:10 -0700 Message-ID: <4F9B0A42.3040209@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:06:10 -0700 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <1335217712-10154-1-git-send-email-obi@opendreambox.org> In-Reply-To: <1335217712-10154-1-git-send-email-obi@opendreambox.org> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] {kernel, module}.bbclass: don't run depmod for module packages during do_rootfs X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:15:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04/23/2012 02:48 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > * depmod already gets executed by pkg_postinst_kernel-image. > > * If you build a module using module.bbclass, > pkg_postinst returns 1 in do_rootfs, causing > pkg_postinst to run again on first boot. To > improve this situation, I copied pkg_postinst > from kernel.bbclass to module.bbclass. This was > rejected by Koen, because he doesn't like the > code from kernel.bblcass, which uses > ${STAGING_DIR_KERNEL}. Richard then suggested > that calling depmod during do_rootfs wasn't > necessary at all, because it already gets done by > kernel-image. > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter > --- > meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 4 +--- > meta/classes/module.bbclass | 7 +++---- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass > index 3519e7c..c21ab96 100644 > --- a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass > +++ b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass > @@ -276,9 +276,7 @@ fi > } > > pkg_postinst_modules () { > -if [ -n "$D" ]; then > - ${HOST_PREFIX}depmod -A -b $D -F ${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}/System.map-${KERNEL_VERSION} ${KERNEL_VERSION} > -else > +if [ -z "$D" ]; then > depmod -a > update-modules || true > fi > diff --git a/meta/classes/module.bbclass b/meta/classes/module.bbclass > index 53c16b7..91628e4 100644 > --- a/meta/classes/module.bbclass > +++ b/meta/classes/module.bbclass > @@ -37,15 +37,14 @@ module_do_install() { > } > > pkg_postinst_append () { > - if [ -n "$D" ]; then > - exit 1 > - fi > +if [ -z "$D" ]; then > depmod -a > update-modules || true > +fi > } > > pkg_postrm_append () { > - update-modules || true > +update-modules || true > } > > EXPORT_FUNCTIONS do_compile do_install Merged into OE-Core Thanks Sau!