From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga10.intel.com ([192.55.52.92] helo=fmsmga102.fm.intel.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SQQAD-0000HM-PQ for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 23:35:45 +0200 Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com ([209.85.210.45]) by mga11.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 04 May 2012 14:25:57 -0700 Received: by dadv2 with SMTP id v2so4623871dad.4 for ; Fri, 04 May 2012 14:25:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=fPxHVXQUEGbvE8An8Iuy+nl6IlunW7mztysCDUeyeb8=; b=hg136HEo3ejfxjcwpYtpgJMprmcUe9LFk9384AaOgAwuNY8xU2wZLpa2u97N7yiIp4 BngfR4Y8bhvTKGrNJ1FZ5DPsd8K4BhZjJ48Klq3YjwtF49COqN7zn0aj/B0aLmlXWkQa X0xGd0H9TzGzvWB0draoFxHtK1LSc30nz/vx6ZLEXuF9u4ga2Ev2zrdyEde21f9Sm9bZ qDz2QamhIeKmy9KjPGeFvATnO/FicTW85OAYbPVVZ2HveEqQNGtDniIY+IGbiDqoEX4k PASar/sx8luSHal6FTO3GbciN4uJiFjbv/f+Xone9u5YXWtUYczETR39vabogyK8f/PA /Qxw== Received: by 10.68.221.227 with SMTP id qh3mr14992687pbc.43.1336166757070; Fri, 04 May 2012 14:25:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.10.254] (c-98-246-229-6.hsd1.or.comcast.net. [98.246.229.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id og6sm9684322pbb.42.2012.05.04.14.25.55 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 04 May 2012 14:25:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FA44961.4090409@intel.com> Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 14:25:53 -0700 From: Scott Garman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <372b4f451158c03f0d62bf406db1a16a883faa80.1336138307.git.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> <020C25C7-7981-4351-9AC3-F666A813A35A@dominion.thruhere.net> <3787476.jCWbAWHvna@helios> <1336144438.23777.22.camel@ted> <5FC2CA51-59D7-43CA-8FDB-13B7E97D08E6@dominion.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: <5FC2CA51-59D7-43CA-8FDB-13B7E97D08E6@dominion.thruhere.net> X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmOFjTkAniagqo+4IRT7KZ27EDvG6wVz0vUHkNpdfNeQZnDMHCWV2x1jx4jGk4VHs1f+Ctw Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] buildhistory: fix multiple commit of images and packages at the same time X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 21:35:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/04/2012 08:16 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >>>> On Friday 04 May 2012 15:50:16 Koen Kooi wrote: >>>>> Looks good to me. If this goes in, can it go on the denzil >>>>> shortlist as well? >>>> >>>> I hope so, hence I've CC'd Scott Garman who is pulling together >>>> a branch for 1.2.1. >>> >>> oe-core or poky? I only care about oe-core. >> >> Both. Nothing goes into poky these days unless it comes from one of >> the appropriate trees. > > That's not what I was asking. I was asking it scott is doing a poky > or oe-core effort. From Scotts emails it seems like a poky effort. Hi Koen, I apologize for having made some confusing comments earlier about rebasing a denzil-next branch on my poky-contrib repo from being based on oe-core to poky. Since then, Richard has given me access to the oe-core-contrib repo, and I am now maintaining two denzil-next branches. This one is based on oe-core: http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=sgarman/denzil-next and this one is based on poky: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=sgarman/denzil-next My workflow will continue to be based on how Richard pulls commits into Poky master - which only happens after they have been merged into oe-core first. Scott -- Scott Garman Embedded Linux Engineer - Yocto Project Intel Open Source Technology Center