From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SS9gu-0003hD-6h for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 18:24:40 +0200 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q49GEi6t002192 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 9 May 2012 09:14:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.25.32.41] (172.25.32.41) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.255.0; Wed, 9 May 2012 09:14:44 -0700 Message-ID: <4FAA97F3.3050900@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 11:14:43 -0500 From: Jason Wessel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <1336571192-15711-1-git-send-email-jason.wessel@windriver.com> <056CEBF9-AB73-43AB-ABFF-C511347BB8B3@dominion.thruhere.net> <4FAA96FC.30707@balister.org> In-Reply-To: <4FAA96FC.30707@balister.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] .gitignore: add /bitbake to the ignore list for external distributions X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 16:24:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/09/2012 11:10 AM, Philip Balister wrote: > > I guess I need to send my patch to oe-core I use to stop the locatoin > being hardcoded by the script that comes with oe-core. Certainly that is another very reasonable approach to the problem. Assuming it doesn't affect performance (and I can't imagine that it would), I'll gladly have the oe-core and bitbake at the same level in the directory hierarchy, and then there is absolutely no need for the patch to the .gitignore. Thanks, Jason.