From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-relay2.palm.com ([64.28.152.243]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SSGz1-0003mO-Ez for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 02:11:51 +0200 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,560,1330934400"; d="scan'208";a="13415649" Received: from unknown (HELO ushqusdns3.palm.com) ([148.92.223.90]) by smtp-relay2.palm.com with ESMTP; 09 May 2012 17:00:53 -0700 Received: from fuji-land.noir.com ([10.100.2.2]) by ushqusdns3.palm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4A00qDj030167; Wed, 9 May 2012 17:00:53 -0700 Message-ID: <4FAB0534.5070205@palm.com> Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 17:00:52 -0700 From: Rich Pixley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <4FA17B2A.5060903@palm.com> <4FA17FA7.9030805@windriver.com> <4FA187F4.9040003@palm.com> <4FA18DA7.6010205@windriver.com> <4FA18EC8.5040504@palm.com> <4FA18F9D.5090805@windriver.com> <1335999994.30113.39.camel@ted> <4FA6B6AC.60301@palm.com> <1336480442.25084.74.camel@ted> <4FAAAEB6.2060703@palm.com> <1336595524.2494.77.camel@ted> <4FAAFBB5.10004@palm.com> <1336606329.2494.105.camel@ted> In-Reply-To: <1336606329.2494.105.camel@ted> Subject: Re: SetScene tasks hang forever? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 00:11:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 5/9/12 16:32 , Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 16:20 -0700, Rich Pixley wrote: >> My rebuild completed in 5 seconds. >> >> Thank you very much! >> >> I'd rather not fork bitbake locally. Can I expect this patch to show up >> in git://git.openembedded.org/bitbake sometime soon? > Yes, I just wanted to confirm we were fixing the right problem... > > I'll post it to the bitbake list and merge in a day or two assuming no > negative feedback. I'm running more thorough tests as I type. > I still wonder if that stamp mode is useful but that is a different > discussion. If I'm understanding your other message, then no, it's probably not. My only concern is that in the A depends on B depends on C case, changing C forces a rebuild of A. I don't really care which mechanism makes that happen. --rich