From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail.dream-property.net ([82.149.226.172])
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <obi@opendreambox.org>) id 1SWOPs-0003pL-9b
	for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
	Mon, 21 May 2012 10:56:41 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.dream-property.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCED315C62F;
	Mon, 21 May 2012 10:46:31 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.dream-property.net
Received: from mail.dream-property.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (mail.dream-property.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with LMTP id kB9jO6AeFipR; Mon, 21 May 2012 10:46:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [172.22.22.61] (drms-590ed1c8.pool.mediaWays.net
	[89.14.209.200])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.dream-property.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2529C315C62E;
	Mon, 21 May 2012 10:46:21 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4FBA00DC.4000709@opendreambox.org>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 10:46:20 +0200
From: Andreas Oberritter <obi@opendreambox.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>
References: <1337187331-4945-1-git-send-email-obi@opendreambox.org>
	<89109968-DC24-477E-9E9D-2F255D1EB93B@dominion.thruhere.net>
	<4FB3F434.2040703@opendreambox.org>
	<lymx55fs0d.fsf@ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de>
In-Reply-To: <lymx55fs0d.fsf@ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] avahi-systemd: drop postrm, use prerm instead
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 08:56:44 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 18.05.2012 17:06, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> 
> 
> Andreas Oberritter <obi-Le4rqY8tBtjh/77Yhslz0w@public.gmane.org> writes:
> 
>> What's the use case for removing packages offline
> 
> I am developing very much with NFS root filesystems (--> the temporary
> image directory which is kept by IMAGE_KEEPROOTFS=1).  Packaging operations
> like install, remove or upgrade are common actions to test recipes and
> applications.

Just to make sure we're talking about the same thing: Do you run opkg-cl
on the build machine to remove or upgrade packages inside the target's
NFS root?

Regards,
Andreas