From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: damien.lespiau@intel.com, "Wold, Saul" <saul.wold@intel.com>,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Braindump on Bootloaders, Image Types, and Installers
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 09:28:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FCF8540.9000000@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0LawLH56WhV8KcXXKxzP6b4MnrpQHrkoQ2q2PJ3BR+-8OQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/06/2012 05:39 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 5 June 2012 21:54, Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> * Disk Image
>> - create partitioned images (not just volume images)
>> - intended to be written to USB sticks, MMC drives, or SATA disks
>> - may require a script to assemble the image for specific target
>> devices.
>
> Can we get an option to specify the size of the target device? I've a
> 4GB stick that I'm using with .hddimg (being the lucky owner of a box
> that actually boots them!) and it's sad to see the rootfs being only a
> little bigger than the contents when there is about 3.5G of empty disk
> space available.
I believe this is a better fit for the diskimage type with proper
partitions. I don't have data regarding performance of a loop mounted
filesystem versus a proper block device, but my gut feel is that using
block devices for large partitions will provide a better experience.
If we did want to allow for the use of the entire disk, we should find a
way to do so without bloating the image files themselves with empty
filesystem space. Does anyone know if we can use sparse files to
accomplish this with rootfs.img?
Thanks,
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-06 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-05 20:54 RFC: Braindump on Bootloaders, Image Types, and Installers Darren Hart
2012-06-06 12:39 ` Burton, Ross
2012-06-06 16:28 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2012-06-06 16:47 ` Mark Hatle
2012-06-07 16:11 ` Koen Kooi
2012-06-08 6:16 ` Saul Wold
2012-06-08 7:38 ` Koen Kooi
2012-06-08 23:49 ` Darren Hart
2012-06-07 6:52 ` Anders Darander
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-06-05 21:58 Daniel Lazzari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FCF8540.9000000@linux.intel.com \
--to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=damien.lespiau@intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=ross.burton@intel.com \
--cc=saul.wold@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox