From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail1.windriver.com ([147.11.146.13]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Scmgx-0005lN-5g for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 02:04:39 +0200 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q57Ns9Fx005673 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 16:54:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.163.142] (128.224.163.142) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.255.0; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 16:54:09 -0700 Message-ID: <4FD13F1F.20805@windriver.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 07:54:07 +0800 From: Robert Yang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <5f256583bca8c2d4225c379cc9b7ca23f374dcdc.1339051007.git.liezhi.yang@windriver.com> <20120607093144.GF3140@jama.jama.net> <4FD098A1.3020105@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4FD098A1.3020105@linux.intel.com> Cc: "Zhao, Zhenfeng" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] opkg 0.1.8: do_fetch failed since no checksum specified X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:04:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/07/2012 08:03 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > On 06/07/2012 02:31 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 05:24:39PM +0800, Robert Yang wrote: >>> * We use meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb by default, the >>> opkg_0.1.8.bb failed since no checksum specified. >>> >>> * The add_vercmp.patch in both opkg/ and opkg-0.1.8/, remove the one >>> in opkg-0.1.8/ >>> >>> This patch doesn't impact the output, so I think that we don't have to >>> increment the PR. >>> >>> [YOCTO #2498] >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Robert Yang >>> --- >>> .../opkg/opkg-0.1.8/add_vercmp.patch | 36 -------------------- >>> meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.1.8.bb | 5 ++- >>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) >>> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg-0.1.8/add_vercmp.patch >>> >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg-0.1.8/add_vercmp.patch >>> b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg-0.1.8/add_vercmp.patch >>> deleted file mode 100644 >>> index c3396d5..0000000 >>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg-0.1.8/add_vercmp.patch >>> +++ /dev/null >>> @@ -1,36 +0,0 @@ >>> -Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [other] >>> - >>> -Index: trunk/libopkg/opkg.c >>> -=================================================================== >>> ---- trunk.orig/libopkg/opkg.c 2010-01-26 20:32:19.000000000 +0000 >>> -+++ trunk/libopkg/opkg.c 2010-01-26 20:40:34.000000000 +0000 >>> -@@ -876,3 +876,18 @@ >>> - >>> - return ret; >>> - } >>> -+ >>> -+int >>> -+opkg_compare_versions (const char *ver1, const char *ver2) >>> -+{ >>> -+ pkg_t *pkg1, *pkg2; >>> -+ >>> -+ pkg1 = pkg_new(); >>> -+ pkg2 = pkg_new(); >>> -+ >>> -+ parse_version(pkg1, ver1); >>> -+ parse_version(pkg2, ver2); >>> -+ >>> -+ return pkg_compare_versions(pkg1, pkg2); >>> -+} >>> -+ >>> -Index: trunk/libopkg/opkg.h >>> -=================================================================== >>> ---- trunk.orig/libopkg/opkg.h 2010-01-26 20:32:19.000000000 +0000 >>> -+++ trunk/libopkg/opkg.h 2010-01-26 20:35:19.000000000 +0000 >>> -@@ -58,4 +58,6 @@ >>> - >>> - int opkg_repository_accessibility_check(void); >>> - >>> -+int opkg_compare_versions (const char *ver1, const char *ver2); >>> -+ >>> - #endif /* OPKG_H */ >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.1.8.bb >>> b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.1.8.bb >>> index c206b37..785b6ca 100644 >>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.1.8.bb >>> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.1.8.bb >>> @@ -1,8 +1,11 @@ >>> require opkg.inc >>> >>> SRC_URI = "http://opkg.googlecode.com/files/opkg-${PV}.tar.gz \ >>> - file://add_vercmp.patch \ >>> + file://opkg/add_vercmp.patch \ >> >> is this "opkg/" really needed? >> > If it's getting removed, is it needed at all? > I removed the opkg-0.1.8/add_vercmp.patch to let it use the opkg/add_vercmp.patch, so this line is needed, but the "opkg/" is not needed, I have updated this and pushed to git repo. // Robert > Sau! > >>> file://headerfix.patch \ >>> " >>> >>> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "c714ce0e4863bf1315e3b6913ffe3299" >>> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >>> "ff94bf30bd662d49c4b5057e3a0818d062731adaa555d59abd677ec32a3c1c60" >>> + >>> PR = "${INC_PR}.0" >>> -- >>> 1.7.1 >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Openembedded-core mailing list >>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > >