From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SfFut-0006Hz-Mr for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 21:41:15 +0200 Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Jun 2012 12:30:27 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="165775659" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.12.138]) ([10.255.12.138]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Jun 2012 12:30:27 -0700 Message-ID: <4FDA3BD3.1090300@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:30:27 -0700 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <1339487948-30612-1-git-send-email-bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> <4FDA340C.5070300@linux.intel.com> <1339701258.24333.98.camel@ted> In-Reply-To: <1339701258.24333.98.camel@ted> Subject: Re: [PATCH] strace: update to 4.7 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:41:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/14/2012 12:14 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 11:57 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: >> On 06/12/2012 12:59 AM, Bogdan Marinescu wrote: >>> Removed the x32 specific patches, since they seem to be fully >>> integrated into 4.7. Also removed the sigmask patch, since the >>> new version doesn't seem to use sigmask anymore. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu >>> --- >>> .../strace/strace-4.6/sigmask.patch | 23 - >>> .../strace-4.6/strace-4.6_add_x32_support.patch | 1242 -------------------- >>> meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace_4.6.bb | 23 - >>> meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace_4.7.bb | 20 + >>> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1288 deletions(-) >>> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace-4.6/sigmask.patch >>> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace-4.6/strace-4.6_add_x32_support.patch >>> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace_4.6.bb >>> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace_4.7.bb >>> >> Did you do a git mv? by removing and creating, the git history gets >> lost, can you respin this? > > This is an urban myth. git does not track renames, ever. Some of the > tools can detect and display things with "rename detection" though. > > So the patch was just sent without rename detection, it will make no > difference to the history whatsoever if merged. It can be harder to > review though. Rename detection doesn't always work in the cases of > large delta, the exact threshold can be configured. > If that's the case, then this passed the rest of my testing also can could be included in the C-Pull, I just dropped, I will pull it back in, but not update the main request. Sau! > Cheers, > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > >