Re: [PATCH 2/3] lsbinitscripts: Remove original /etc/init.d/functions when building an lsb image

[Xiaofeng Yan <xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com>]

On 2012年06月18日 10:57, Xiaofeng Yan wrote:
> On 2012年06月15日 22:59, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 17:30 +0800, xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com wrote:
>>> From: Xiaofeng Yan<xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com>
>>>
>>> The linking will fail when an original functions exist. So remove the
>>> original functions when building an lsb image and make functions 
>>> linking to
>>> functions.lsbinitscripts successfully.
>>>
>>> [YOCTO #2133]
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan<xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com>
>>> ---
>>>   meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts_9.03.bb |    8 +++++++-
>>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts_9.03.bb 
>>> b/meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts_9.03.bb
>>> index dd92a92..73bea2f 100644
>>> --- a/meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts_9.03.bb
>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts_9.03.bb
>>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ DESCRIPTION = "SysV init scripts which only is used 
>>> in an LSB image"
>>>   SECTION = "base"
>>>   LICENSE = "GPLv2"
>>>   DEPENDS = "popt"
>>> -PR = "r0"
>>> +PR = "r1"
>>>
>>>   LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = 
>>> "file://COPYING;md5=ebf4e8b49780ab187d51bd26aaa022c6"
>>>
>>> @@ -25,3 +25,9 @@ do_install(){
>>>       install -d ${D}/etc/init.d/
>>>       install -m 0755 ${S}/rc.d/init.d/functions 
>>> ${D}/etc/init.d/functions
>>>   }
>>> +
>>> +pkg_postinst_${PN} () {
>>> +    if [ -f "/etc/init.d/functions" ]; then
>>> +        rm -f /etc/init.d/functions
>>> +    fi
>>> +}
>> This looks highly suspicious to me. Shouldn't the other provider of this
>> be put under control for update-alternatives too or something?
> Thanks for your comments.
> the other provider of this is from initscripts_1.0.bb, installing all 
> of init-scripts in the stage of installing without using 
> update-alternatives. So the functions is a file instead of linking 
> mode. An error appear when lsbinicscritps replace initscripts if not 
> removing file functions. So I remove the original functions for making 
> the latter linking successfully. What is the purpose is for avoiding 
> to modify the other non-lsb bb files. The changes of this will be only 
> in lsb image.
Can we add the removing function if not a linking when using 
update-alternatives ?
> Thanks
> Yan
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core