Re: [PATCH 3/4] kernel: Add kernel-headers package for target module build

[Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>]

On 12-06-29 03:22 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Darren Hart<dvhart@linux.intel.com>  wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/28/2012 11:04 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Darren Hart<dvhart@linux.intel.com>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> However, I don't have a strong opinion here, I'll happily call it
>>>> kernel-devel if that is strongly preferred by some.
>>>
>>> in oe terminology it will be -dev
>>
>> THe other reason I didn't go that route is that we already have a
>> kernel-dev (although I don't much like the way it is used):
>>
>>  From kernel.bbclass:
>>
>> PACKAGES = "kernel kernel-base kernel-vmlinux kernel-image kernel-dev \
>>             kernel-misc kernel-headers"
>> FILES = ""
>> FILES_kernel-image = "/boot/${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}*"
>> FILES_kernel-dev = "/boot/System.map* /boot/Module.symvers* /boot/config*"
>> FILES_kernel-vmlinux = "/boot/vmlinux*"
>> # misc is a package to contain files we need in staging
>> FILES_kernel-misc = "/kernel/include/config /kernel/scripts
>> /kernel/drivers/crypto /kernel/drivers/media"
>> FILES_kernel-headers = "/usr/src/kernel-headers"
>>
>> And looking at that it appears I broke kernel-misc by moving things to
>> /usr/src (didn't notice that in my testing).
>>
>> How would you propose we redefine the above in order to use "kernel-dev"
>> for the new package?
>
> hmmm interesting so I guess, linux-dev being already taken, you might
> call it linux-kernel-headers as you were doing. So we have
> linux-libc-headers and linux-kernel-headers to differentiate between
> raw and sanitized headers

What would break if the new files were simply added to the existing 
kernel-dev
package ? I'm already putting System.map and others on targets in
different environments for dev/debug, so would adding enough to build
kernel modules on the target be a big problem ?

But I probably just don't understand *what* the existing -dev package
is used for, and my comment makes no sense :)

Outside of that, I also like linux-kernel-headers as the package name.

Cheers,

Bruce

>
>>
>> --
>> Darren Hart
>> Intel Open Source Technology Center
>> Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
>>
>>