From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Cc: Poky <poky@yoctoproject.org>,
"openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org"
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [poky] [PATCH 4/5] tasl-core-sdk: Add kernel-dev to task-core-sdk RDEPENDS
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:01:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FEE33CB.3010609@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMKF1sqrg5O7A1Tt=XjTzc0PfV5ZKcETe1tJfHOP460NNmpojw@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/29/2012 02:59 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> ALLOW_EMPTY = "1"
>> #PACKAGEFUNCS =+ 'generate_sdk_pkgs'
>> @@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ RDEPENDS_task-core-sdk = "\
>> distcc \
>> ldd \
>> file \
>> - tcl"
>> + tcl \
>> + kernel-dev"
>
> Doesn't this.make sdk to be machine specific now
It does indeed as the kernel-dev contains the system map, config, and
possibly even modified headers dependingon the KBRANCH.
Is task-core-sdk intended to be only architecture specific?
If so, I can just add kernel-dev to the -sdk image recipes directly
rather than modifying task-core-sdk.
Jessica, any opinion here?
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-29 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-29 19:54 [PATCH 0/5 V2] Enable building modules on target Darren Hart
2012-06-29 19:54 ` [PATCH 1/5] linux-libc-headers-yocto: Do not include linux-yocto Darren Hart
2012-06-29 19:54 ` [PATCH 2/5] linux-yocto: Use INC_PR and move kernel require to linux-yocto.inc Darren Hart
2012-06-29 19:54 ` [PATCH 3/5] kernel: Add kernel headers to kernel-dev package Darren Hart
2012-06-29 20:01 ` Khem Raj
2012-06-29 20:09 ` Darren Hart
2012-06-29 19:54 ` [PATCH 4/5] tasl-core-sdk: Add kernel-dev to task-core-sdk RDEPENDS Darren Hart
2012-06-29 19:59 ` Darren Hart
2012-06-29 21:59 ` [poky] " Khem Raj
2012-06-29 23:01 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2012-06-29 23:23 ` Zhang, Jessica
2012-06-29 23:27 ` Darren Hart
2012-06-29 19:54 ` [PATCH 5/5] linux-yocto-custom: Remove linux-tools Darren Hart
2012-06-29 20:01 ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-06-29 20:03 ` [PATCH 0/5 V2] Enable building modules on target Bruce Ashfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FEE33CB.3010609@linux.intel.com \
--to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=poky@yoctoproject.org \
--cc=raj.khem@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox