From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11])
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <mark.hatle@windriver.com>) id 1SlnTZ-0004Pi-3h
	for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
	Mon, 02 Jul 2012 22:44:05 +0200
Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40])
	by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q62KWvG0022068
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL)
	for <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Mon, 2 Jul 2012 13:32:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msp-dhcp21.wrs.com (172.25.34.21) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com
	(147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.255.0;
	Mon, 2 Jul 2012 13:32:57 -0700
Message-ID: <4FF20578.9030109@windriver.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:32:56 -0500
From: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Organization: Wind River Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
	rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
References: <cover.1341032578.git.mark.hatle@windriver.com>
	<28adf5fdb58c3409ec2dcc1a8dfffaaf2a8eab2b.1341032578.git.mark.hatle@windriver.com>
	<1341259953.2886.29.camel@x121e.pbcl.net>
In-Reply-To: <1341259953.2886.29.camel@x121e.pbcl.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] image.bbclass: Add support to build the SDK in parallel with the image
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 20:44:05 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 7/2/12 3:12 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 00:07 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> diff --git a/meta/classes/image.bbclass b/meta/classes/image.bbclass
>> index 4f50376..7e41982 100644
>> --- a/meta/classes/image.bbclass
>> +++ b/meta/classes/image.bbclass
>> @@ -3,6 +3,11 @@ inherit rootfs_${IMAGE_PKGTYPE}
>>   IMAGETEST ?= "dummy"
>>   inherit imagetest-${IMAGETEST}
>>
>> +inherit populate_sdk_base
>
> This seems to haul a vast amount of stuff into image.bbclass.  Is it
> really necessary to have all that in there by default?

Yes, in order to build an SDK that matches an image, it is.

We need to have all of the code that is needed for both IMAGE and SDK 
generation.  The SDK code is only active if and only if you call the 
populate_sdk task.

--Mark

> p.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>