From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SmUSO-0005ab-E0 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 20:37:44 +0200 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Jul 2012 11:26:40 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="164056889" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.252.120.218]) ([10.252.120.218]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Jul 2012 11:26:39 -0700 Message-ID: <4FF48ADE.6060302@intel.com> Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 21:26:38 +0300 From: Laurentiu Palcu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <1341298228-4412-1-git-send-email-laurentiu.palcu@intel.com> <1341298228-4412-5-git-send-email-laurentiu.palcu@intel.com> <20120704172309.GF15100@jama.jama.net> In-Reply-To: <20120704172309.GF15100@jama.jama.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] libdrm: upgrade to 2.4.35 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 18:37:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/04/2012 08:23 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 09:50:21AM +0300, Laurentiu Palcu wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu > > Is there specific reason that it wasn't upgraded to latest 2.4.37? > > Maybe it was because intel test is failing in 2.4.37: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/commit/?id=8fad46b614a156e3a0e65cd0af4c132a5820d29e > Actually, I simply forgot to check if there was a newer version upstream than the one I had (I probably had an older list from the package reporting system). I did, however, realize there were some new versions upstream when I upgraded directfb, libx11, etc (patches on their way as I write these lines)... These were upgraded to the latest versions. So, libdrm will be upgraded to the latest too. Sorry about the confusion, Laurentiu > just wanted to be sure before rebasing glamo patch in meta-openmoko > layer for 2.4.35.. > > Cheers, > >> --- >> .../drm/{libdrm_2.4.34.bb => libdrm_2.4.35.bb} | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> rename meta/recipes-graphics/drm/{libdrm_2.4.34.bb => libdrm_2.4.35.bb} (62%) >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/drm/libdrm_2.4.34.bb b/meta/recipes-graphics/drm/libdrm_2.4.35.bb >> similarity index 62% >> rename from meta/recipes-graphics/drm/libdrm_2.4.34.bb >> rename to meta/recipes-graphics/drm/libdrm_2.4.35.bb >> index bf489cf..3677b8d 100644 >> --- a/meta/recipes-graphics/drm/libdrm_2.4.34.bb >> +++ b/meta/recipes-graphics/drm/libdrm_2.4.35.bb >> @@ -8,5 +8,5 @@ SRC_URI += "file://installtests.patch \ >> file://GNU_SOURCE_definition.patch \ >> " >> >> -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "293cb2b31392d52caa02ab0861dfc2c9" >> -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "a468570e7c85107b7c2f8eaceeebaa8f8a0da86482618f445bb74fa0b0d0f8d0" >> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "a40f5293dc0a7b49d2a1e959d7d60194" >> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "c390aee132f05910edb09398b70e108c6b53f9b69b21914a9ea3165eed6f1b21" >> -- >> 1.7.9.5 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core