From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1So8zL-0002xi-W1 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:06:37 +0200 Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Jul 2012 00:55:25 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="120227303" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.12.157]) ([10.255.12.157]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Jul 2012 00:55:24 -0700 Message-ID: <4FFA8E6C.90504@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 00:55:24 -0700 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120605 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <1341724701.6761.177.camel@trz-ThinkPad-T420> In-Reply-To: <1341724701.6761.177.camel@trz-ThinkPad-T420> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf-scripting/perf-tui features, v2 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 08:06:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/07/2012 10:18 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 15:29 -0500, tom.zanussi@intel.com wrote: >> From: Tom Zanussi >> >> This patchset adds perf-scriping and perf-tui features as >> a per-arch thing rather than per-machine, as suggested by >> Richard Purdie. >> >> I just started testing this, it works so far, but thought >> I'd put it out there now in case there were comments before >> putting too much effort into that, and possibly giving other >> people a chance to try it out. >> > > Looks fine after more build-testing: qemux86, qemux86-64, crownbay, > sugarbay, qemuarm and qemuppc both with and without perf-scripting and > perf-tui, and builds without perf as well all build fine here. > Tom, I am sorry, I am not sure how else to say this, I have tested master with the only the following change and I am still getting the the setup.py failure mentioned. I am not sure what else to suspect at this point, this is Master plus 3 commits, please help me understand where I have gone wrong. This is the branch I have tested, which is 3 commits pasted Master: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=sgw/fail Thanks Sau! > Tom > >> The following changes since commit 5051e9837fa698e03d0a7a8a918ee7aa98409ce1: >> Robert P. J. Day (1): >> bitbake: usermanual: Fix missing markup >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib.git tzanussi/perf-scripting-v2 >> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=tzanussi/perf-scripting-v2 >> >> Tom Zanussi (3): >> perf: add perf.inc >> perf: add arch-specific perf-scripting feature >> perf: add arch-specific perf-tui feature >> >> meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.inc | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf_3.4.bb | 18 +++++++++++++++--- >> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.inc >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > >