Re: Upcoming Yocto 1.2.1 "denzil" release this week.

[Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>]

On 07/11/2012 11:50 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 19:00 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> On Wednesday 11 July 2012 17:55:18 McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Richard Purdie
>>> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 09:57 +0100, Jack Mitchell wrote:
>>>>> Are Khems eglibc patches going to make it in for this - 2.16 is playing
>>>>> havoc with my builds at the moment and surely will with everyone else
>>>>> when the major distros catch up.
>>>>
>>>> Its too late to get those pieces into 1.2.1, they're not even in master
>>>> yet, let alone in a stable release branch.
>>>>
>>>> I'm proposing we get 1.2.1 out, get the 2.16 pieces tested in master,
>>>> then port them to the denzil branch quickly post release so they'd make
>>>> any 1.2.2 release and are available on the git branch for people using
>>>> the stable branch.
>>>
>>> Can you fill me in? Why would a point release include such a dramatic
>>> upgrade?
>>
>> I think what we would be looking at would be just adding the fixes to allow the
>> native packages to build against eglibc 2.16 so it can work on host distros
>> that use it, not bringing eglibc 2.16 itself in for the target.
>
> Right, this would just be to allow edison to work on systems that have a
> native eglibc 2.16. I'm not convinced we have the patches worked out yet
> though. Target eglibc would remain with whatever is in edison (2.13?).
>
I assume you mean denzil, not edison, or do we also need to be planning 
a 1.1.3?

Sau!

> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>