From: Radu Moisan <radu.moisan@intel.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kmod: Handle undefined O_CLOEXEC
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:37:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <500E50C5.8000403@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lywr1uzguj.fsf@ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de>
As far as kmod package is concerned O_CLOEXEC is used in constructs like
"O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC". O_CLOEXEC can be used (is defined) starting with
Linux kernel ≥2.6.23 and glibc ≥2.7 case in which the patch does not
logically changing anything. However, prior Linux kernel ≥2.6.23
O_CLOEXEC is not defined (the case for CentOS 5.8 - kernel 2.6.18) and
using it in code will cause build errors. My patch provides a workaround
for those distributions that do not have O_CLOEXEC define, just to be
able to build stuff. I have not tested on CentOS 5.8 if the applications
are not broken in some way, but that's not in the scope of this patch.
If something does indeed break, then a totally different patch is
required, targeting a backport of kmod for kernel older than 2.6.23.
Radu
On 07/23/2012 05:34 PM, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> Radu Moisan <radu.moisan-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> writes:
>
>> Close-on-exec seems to be unsuported on some architectures like CentOS 5.8
>> and thus causing some packages to fail to build successfully.
> Have you verified that making O_CLOEXEC a noop does not break the
> applications?
>
>
> Enrico
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-24 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-23 14:04 [PATCH v2] kmod: Handle undefined O_CLOEXEC Radu Moisan
2012-07-23 14:34 ` Enrico Scholz
2012-07-24 7:37 ` Radu Moisan [this message]
2012-07-24 13:27 ` Chris Larson
2012-07-24 13:40 ` Burton, Ross
2012-08-15 18:37 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882
2012-08-15 19:10 ` Chris Larson
2012-08-15 19:27 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882
2012-08-15 19:32 ` Burton, Ross
2012-08-29 13:48 ` Radu Moisan
2012-08-29 17:05 ` Saul Wold
2012-08-30 6:42 ` Radu Moisan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=500E50C5.8000403@intel.com \
--to=radu.moisan@intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox