From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SyIEL-0007D2-Tz for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 10:00:02 +0200 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Aug 2012 00:48:16 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="182090342" Received: from lpalcu-linux (HELO [10.237.105.41]) ([10.237.105.41]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Aug 2012 00:48:16 -0700 Message-ID: <501F76BF.9000605@intel.com> Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 10:48:15 +0300 From: Laurentiu Palcu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <501CD3EE.3080100@intel.com> <501D2B2B.6070806@intel.com> <3103BB42-D7DD-456B-8733-9A019CA66E99@dominion.thruhere.net> <501EA63F.9090304@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] gtk-icon-cache: call postinst scriplet at do_rootfs time X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 08:00:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 08/06/2012 01:49 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Andreas Müller > wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Laurentiu Palcu >> wrote: >>> You could give it a test yourselves and let me know your results. I will >>> send a version 2 of the patchset(as soon as we all agree on the >>> solution), with some changes suggested by Mark and some PR bumps >>> suggested by Koen. >> With the image I usually work with [1] and AMD Phenom II X6 1090 16GB >> RAM I get a measurable delay - see attachment. I would not be happy >> loosing latest do_rootfs enhancements (off topic - thanks for that). >> Remeber we are only talking of gtk-update-icon-cache. OK I could buy >> an intel host and work just with sato images but... I suppose you could, but nobody asked you to do that, it's your choice what's your build machine or what you'll be building for. Thanks for the measurements though. They do, indeed, show quite a significant amount of time (around 6 minutes). A run-once solution is to be considered in this case. >> >> Andreas >> >> [1] https://gitorious.org/schnitzeltony-oe-meta/meta-misc/blobs/master/recipes-image/xfce-full-image.bb > OK I know it is not that important: The image created with this patch > series creates tons of messages like Why do you think is not important. Please elaborate. Or is it irony? I don't think is in anybody's benefit if you take this approach. :) All errors/warnings are important and they have to be taken care of. > > xfdesktop:446): GdkPixbuf-WARNING **: Cannot open pixbuf loader module > file '/usr/lib/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache': No such file or > directory > > and don't have icons at all. Did you run test that (on a hardware > plattform different to your host)? I only tested on qemu. And it worked just fine, without any errors. With all icons in place. > > Andreas > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >