From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.21] helo=orsmga101.jf.intel.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Syt5t-0005N8-08 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 01:21:45 +0200 Received: from mail-yx0-f180.google.com ([209.85.213.180]) by mga02.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 07 Aug 2012 16:09:57 -0700 Received: by yenq6 with SMTP id q6so151436yen.25 for ; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 16:09:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=WZyWQhS4+AwrjkAkGswu8veHFN/zAwmEu6dOp42Ibh0=; b=Lvy7uTs6UfcvKICibOgcoiOniORiRtmzbMGqSBX+BHLUDmnjE0grVnkyvSNeBNjHbA Xq7pj4DCXQLZJ71v0CxWioNT0rg4OasGXeoJGF6ia29HrIbWiwVjmgFxaxWIt8RMr5j4 nQyLkfonzya7nvNcTFiO67OZs57w3bzAtd8HMsWqy771aJdU+UN9U95Nqm78UWRo+o81 1Rk9/zxJn248ZRUJwvn53InPXT8TaTQRDRC56YlnTa+gU3UslzXuqTSZDeDFUs2KMumR gCdDKPMnqLvSXtvWSXXV8ucZOg34Q8l4oJhLs3mFWv0/PTSGMUgmztt8cIVBbCtGLXqf dbKw== Received: by 10.66.75.97 with SMTP id b1mr29445108paw.15.1344380996123; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 16:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (c-76-105-137-48.hsd1.or.comcast.net. [76.105.137.48]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pe2sm8594659pbc.59.2012.08.07.16.09.54 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 07 Aug 2012 16:09:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5021A04D.9040403@intel.com> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 16:10:05 -0700 From: Scott Garman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <1344325488-20479-1-git-send-email-koen@dominion.thruhere.net> <20120807081710.GQ3267@jama.jama.net> <9A466F05-060B-442E-ADD5-A015FE979942@dominion.thruhere.net> <50213D45.2070802@intel.com> <1E5BDEED-DBC6-463A-AE9E-2CF45C4920B6@dominion.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: <1E5BDEED-DBC6-463A-AE9E-2CF45C4920B6@dominion.thruhere.net> X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQknVmZfr/MYhxjAH43rR4qZ/sF0jWreI4zPw0UwZKVrL5s90Yo6HmIgTcqWJT2DP6OWkqZs Subject: Re: [PATCH][for-denzil 1/8] opkg-utils: bump SRCREV for Packages cache fix and other fixes X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 23:21:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/07/2012 11:19 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >>>>> RDEPENDS_${PN} = "python" >>>>> RDEPENDS_${PN}_virtclass-native = "" -SRCREV = >>>>> "16665959c330b5958c0f0f4624a9ca7f823f98de" +SRCREV = >>>>> "44df9dd3dc411ca1255cb4b23bde7eb71aed4778" >>>> >>>> Better to use latest for this (only 3 commits, 2 of them >>>> fixing python-2.6) >>> >>> Should I cherry-pick them from master to keep history or just >>> make a single, new update to latest SRCREV for the denzil >>> branch? >> >> I slightly favor cherry-picks from master when possible. > > Since the cherry-picks would be incremental, can these 8 be queued > and extra cherrypicks be added at a later point? I need to actually > test those before submitting :) Appreciate that - this works for me. Scott -- Scott Garman Embedded Linux Engineer - Yocto Project Intel Open Source Technology Center