Re: [PATCH 1/1] at 3.1.13: get 'at' depends on 'flex-native' explicitly

[Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>]

On 08/09/2012 05:59 AM, wenzong.fan@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Wenzong Fan <wenzong.fan@windriver.com>
>
> 'at' needs flex to generate source file lex.yy.c, but it doesn't
> depend on flex-native directly; This maybe cause a do_compile
> failure if flex-native is not built or included in project.
>
> Error message is:
>      error: lex.yy.c: No such file or directory
>
> Get 'at' depends on flex-native to fix this potential issue.
>
> [YOCTO #2919]
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenzong Fan <wenzong.fan@windriver.com>
> ---
>   meta/recipes-extended/at/at_3.1.13.bb |    4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/at/at_3.1.13.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/at/at_3.1.13.bb
> index ce9396a..a391d6e 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-extended/at/at_3.1.13.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/at/at_3.1.13.bb
> @@ -4,14 +4,14 @@ the system load levels drop to a particular level."
>   SECTION = "base"
>   LICENSE="GPLv2+"
>   LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=4325afd396febcb659c36b49533135d4"
> -DEPENDS = "flex initscripts \
> +DEPENDS = "flex flex-native initscripts \
Ok, I understand the flex-native dependency, that makes sense, but I 
wonder why there was a dependency on flex originally?  Is that actually 
needed?

Sau!

>   	${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'pam', 'libpam', '', d)}"
>   RDEPENDS_${PN} = "${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'pam', '${PAM_DEPS}', '', d)}"
>   PAM_DEPS = "libpam libpam-runtime pam-plugin-env pam-plugin-limits"
>
>   RCONFLICTS_${PN} = "atd"
>   RREPLACES_${PN} = "atd"
> -PR = "r2"
> +PR = "r3"
>
>   SRC_URI = "${DEBIAN_MIRROR}/main/a/at/at_${PV}.orig.tar.gz \
>       file://configure.patch \
>