Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <darren.hart@intel.com>
To: Liang Li <liang.li@windriver.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [discussion] perf: specify SLANG_INC dir for perf
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:35:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <502E56A8.3080109@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120817130151.GA1416@localhost>

On 08/17/2012 06:01 AM, Liang Li wrote:
> On 2012-08-17 18:53, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 18:00 +0800, Liang Li wrote:
>>> I am totally confused, you mentioned 'general kernel do_install', I
>>> assume it's oe-core kernel.bbclass concept. Then you mentioned 'get
>>> the fix upstream in the mainline kernel', how could that happen?
>>>
>>> We are discussing about the solution to 'fix the compile warning to
>>> error' stuff that triggered by the '-I/usr/include/slang', right?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>>  We do not necessarily have to change recipe to fix it since the issue
>>> is not introduced by the recipe, the hard coded '-I/usr/include/slang'
>>> in the Makefile cause the issue, we can fix the root cause by kernel
>>> patch(other than just comment the line out). I see your previous patch
>>> to kernel, by comment out the '-I/usr/include/slang' line in the
>>> Makefile, is the same behavior, but we won't have the change(comment
>>> out -I.. in Makefile) upstream to mainline, right?
>>
>> I am suggesting that firstly, someone send a patch to the mainline
>> kernel which changes -I/usr/include/slang to -I=/usr/include/slang in
>> that Makefile.
>>
>> Secondly, I'm suggesting that we add a line to kernel_do_install() in
>> kernel.bbclass which does a sed on the Makefile as installed into
>> $kerneldir which changes -I/usr/include/slang to -I=/usr/include/slang.
>>
>> We can then drop the patch I added to the linux-yocto kernels.
>>
>> This is all that should be needed, it should fix all the issues people
>> have reported in a way that is acceptable to everyone.
>>
> 
> Ah, I see what you mean now. But we have push acceptable kernel patch
> to linux-yocto kernel first, and propose it to mainline kernel in the
> meantime. With proper kernel patch in linux-yocto kernel(s), we does
> not have to do the second above, right? :)

No, the kernel.bbclass supports more than the linux-yocto kernels. It
needs to be generally useful with 2.6+kernels. The sed patch for the
kernel.bbclass is still necessary.

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel



      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-17 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-03 15:43 [PATCH] perf: pass STAGING_INCDIR(sysroot) to perf Liang Li
2012-08-07 12:56 ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-08-07 14:12   ` Richard Purdie
2012-08-07 14:19     ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-08-07 14:27       ` Richard Purdie
2012-08-07 14:02 ` Richard Purdie
2012-08-07 14:07   ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-08-07 14:22     ` Richard Purdie
2012-08-07 14:29       ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-08-07 14:44         ` Richard Purdie
2012-08-07 15:26           ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-08-07 15:41             ` Richard Purdie
2012-08-07 15:54               ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-08-07 16:02                 ` Richard Purdie
2012-08-08  3:37   ` Liang Li
2012-08-09  0:36     ` Darren Hart
2012-08-09  1:24       ` Liang Li
2012-08-09  1:41         ` Darren Hart
2012-08-09  1:52           ` Liang Li
2012-08-09  3:54             ` Darren Hart
2012-08-09  1:33       ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-08-14  2:17     ` [discussion] perf: specify SLANG_INC dir for perf Liang Li
2012-08-16 15:33       ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-08-16 15:58         ` Richard Purdie
2012-08-16 16:00           ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-08-16 16:12           ` McClintock Matthew-B29882
2012-08-17  3:32           ` Liang Li
2012-08-17  9:35             ` Richard Purdie
2012-08-17 10:00               ` Liang Li
2012-08-17 10:53                 ` Richard Purdie
2012-08-17 12:55                   ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-08-17 13:01                   ` Liang Li
2012-08-17 13:05                     ` Liang Li
2012-08-20 14:48                       ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-08-21  5:08                         ` Liang Li
2012-08-21  8:51                           ` Henning Heinold
2012-08-21  9:19                             ` Liang Li
2012-08-21 10:40                             ` Richard Purdie
2012-08-21 13:07                           ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-08-22  3:01                             ` Liang Li
2012-08-22  5:41                               ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-08-22  8:17                                 ` Liang Li
2012-08-17 14:35                     ` Darren Hart [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=502E56A8.3080109@intel.com \
    --to=darren.hart@intel.com \
    --cc=liang.li@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox