Re: [PATCH v2] busybox: Upgrade to upstream 1.20.2

[Radu Moisan <radu.moisan@intel.com>]

On 08/20/2012 11:31 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Monday 20 August 2012 09:28:41 Phil Blundell wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 09:25 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>>> On Monday 20 August 2012 09:18:17 Phil Blundell wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 10:46 +0300, Radu Moisan wrote:
>>>>> @@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ do_prepare_config () {
>>>>>
>>>>>   		< ${WORKDIR}/defconfig > ${S}/.config
>>>>>   	
>>>>>   	sed -i -e '/CONFIG_STATIC/d' .config
>>>>>   	echo "# CONFIG_STATIC is not set" >> .config
>>>>>
>>>>> +	sed -i -e '/CONFIG_LSOF/d' .config
>>>>> +	echo "# CONFIG_LSOF is not set" >> .config
>>>>>
>>>>>   	for i in 'CROSS' 'DISTRO FEATURES'; do echo "### $i"; done >> \
>>>>>   	
>>>>>   		${S}/.config
>>>>>   	
>>>>>   	sed -i -e '${configmangle}' ${S}/.config
>>>> Why is this desirable?
>>> Well, the more appropriate question would be: could we not just update the
>>> defconfig and then make that change to it directly?
>>>
>>> (In case it isn't clear - lsof is being disabled because it was not
>>> enabled in the previous 1.19.4 version.)
>> Ah, I see.  In that case, yes, just updating the defconfig is the right
>> thing to do.  The patch above will, if I am understanding it correctly,
>> make it impossible (or at least quite hard) for any other layer to turn
>> CONFIG_LSOF back on.
> Good point, that would be undesirable.
Any suggestions on how to do that?

thanks,
radu