From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl ([178.33.81.99]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T4S9i-0000Zs-7O for Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:48:42 +0200 Received: by tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 2467AD22E9; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:36:39 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.1.112] (84-10-244-25.dynamic.chello.pl [84.10.244.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl) by tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F0F6D22DE; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:36:17 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5035DD6D.8060205@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:36:13 +0200 From: Marcin Juszkiewicz Organization: Linaro User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120814 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Jansa References: <1345706669-28914-1-git-send-email-marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org> <1345706669-28914-2-git-send-email-marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org> <20120823073139.GK3029@jama.jama.net> In-Reply-To: <20120823073139.GK3029@jama.jama.net> Cc: Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] libcap: fetch from Debian X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:48:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit W dniu 23.08.2012 09:31, Martin Jansa pisze: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 09:24:29AM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> Original location was kernel.org and it was not restored after server >> was hacked. > > So the SRC_URI checksums are different because it was repackaged? Please > include diff of content from those 2 archives in commit message. Content of those archives is exactly same. Checked md5 sums of all file in both.