From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from r-finger.com ([178.79.160.5])
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <tf+lists.yocto@r-finger.com>) id 1T8q1J-0003Te-GE
	for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
	Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:06:09 +0200
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (host81-153-84-143.range81-153.btcentralplus.com
	[81.153.84.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by r-finger.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A70D9ADE
	for <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Tue,  4 Sep 2012 10:53:50 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <5045CFAD.5040003@r-finger.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:53:49 +0100
From: Tomas Frydrych <tf+lists.yocto@r-finger.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:10.0.5) Gecko/20120624 Icedove/10.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
References: <5040A5BB.7040601@r-finger.com>
	<20120903070832.GC3205@jama.jama.net>
	<5045C60B.1020600@r-finger.com>
	<20120904092321.GC3372@jama.jama.net>
In-Reply-To: <20120904092321.GC3372@jama.jama.net>
Subject: Re: runstrip() in package.bbclass fails when run against a kernel module
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:06:09 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


On 04/09/12 10:23, Martin Jansa wrote:
>>> Was this for denzil?
>>>
>>> In master it was fixed a month ago by:
>>> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/meta/classes/package.bbclass?id=a834ab8a6d53cae504fa112a89bab93d726539ec
>>>
>>> Don't know why they merged your patch to master too now..
>>
>> Yes, I run into the bug on Denzil and did not see the alternative fix in
>> master; either one of those fixes the problem, of course.
> 
> Yes but having both in master doesn't make much sense, and someone
> already asked the older fix to be merged to denzil.

I does not do any harm either, but if you prefer to revert that, I will
not complain. (Though, I personally prefer fixing the way the function
was incorrectly called rather than handling a wrong argument inside it. :) )

Tomas