From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TEOIP-00030N-Jd for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 19:42:45 +0200 Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2012 10:29:53 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,450,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="224059272" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.13.229]) ([10.255.13.229]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2012 10:29:51 -0700 Message-ID: <505A010F.6080104@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:29:51 -0700 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Jansa References: In-Reply-To: Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Opkg patch upstreaming and SIGSEGV fix X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:42:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09/19/2012 10:16 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > This depends on > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/36893/ > otherwise warning about missing SRC_URI entries will be shown > > The following changes since commit f06097f4581e4c728c2950a86e025384e4bdcdf0: > > eglibc: Do not use fsqrt in libm when building for fsl ppc with fpu (2012-09-18 07:44:13 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib jansa/opkg > http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=jansa/opkg > > Martin Jansa (3): > opkg: replace local patches with git patches submitted upstream > opkg: add patch to fix SIGSEGV when printing status file > opkg-nogpg: drop SRCREV > > meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg-nogpg_svn.bb | 2 - > .../0001-add-opkg_compare_versions-function.patch | 51 ++++++++++++++ > ...e-the-uname-gname-fields-when-extracting.patch} | 30 +++++--- > ...ix-dependency-issues-for-preinst-scripts.patch} | 65 ++++++++++-------- > ...nst-script-is-not-fatal-with-conf-offlin.patch} | 75 +++++++++++--------- > ...ot-read-etc-opkg-.conf-if-f-is-specified.patch} | 11 ++- > ...tch => 0006-detect-circular-dependencies.patch} | 79 +++++++++++++--------- > ...g-provides-even-when-oldpkg-provides-exis.patch | 46 +++++++++++++ > meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/add_vercmp.patch | 36 ---------- These patches do not have Upstream-Status in the local version, I guess you are trying to preserve the original state? How soon will they be accepted into the upstream? They should still have Upstream-Status: Submitted added. Thanks Sau! > meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb | 15 ++-- > 10 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 152 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/0001-add-opkg_compare_versions-function.patch > rename meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/{add_uname_support.patch => 0002-Ensure-we-use-the-uname-gname-fields-when-extracting.patch} (71%) > rename meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/{fix_installorder.patch => 0003-Fix-dependency-issues-for-preinst-scripts.patch} (82%) > rename meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/{offline_postinstall.patch => 0004-Failed-postinst-script-is-not-fatal-with-conf-offlin.patch} (52%) > rename meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/{conf_override.patch => 0005-Do-not-read-etc-opkg-.conf-if-f-is-specified.patch} (91%) > rename meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/{track_parents.patch => 0006-detect-circular-dependencies.patch} (59%) > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/0007-merge-newpkg-provides-even-when-oldpkg-provides-exis.patch > delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/add_vercmp.patch >