From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
Cc: openembedded-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] opkg: Don't call sync() when installing into an offline root
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 08:15:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <506B04FE.1000502@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348921205.4422.47.camel@x121e.pbcl.net>
On 09/29/2012 05:20 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> Even when installing onto a live target system, calling sync() during
> package installation is of somewhat questionable benefit. But calling
> it on the build host during rootfs construction is certainly useless and
> can cause I/O to stall for several seconds on even a moderately sized
> host which is clearly not desirable.
>
> (From a patch originally by Mike Crowe.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
> ---
> .../opkg/opkg/opkg-no-sync-offline.patch | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/opkg-no-sync-offline.patch
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/opkg-no-sync-offline.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/opkg-no-sync-offline.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b1b3453
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/opkg-no-sync-offline.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +When installing into an offline root, calling sync() is pointless and just
> +hurts performance. Don't let's do that.
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
> +Upstream-Status: Pending
> +
> +--- a/libopkg/opkg_cmd.c 2011-09-08 10:53:07.000000000 +0100
> ++++ b/libopkg/opkg_cmd.c 2011-10-04 10:45:22.278615584 +0100
> +@@ -64,7 +64,8 @@ write_status_files_if_changed(void)
> + opkg_msg(INFO, "Writing status file.\n");
> + opkg_conf_write_status_files();
> + pkg_write_changed_filelists();
> +- sync();
> ++ if (!conf->offline_root)
> ++ sync();
> + } else {
> + opkg_msg(DEBUG, "Nothing to be done.\n");
> + }
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb
> index 820a224..f206cd5 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ SRC_URI = "svn://opkg.googlecode.com/svn;module=trunk;protocol=http \
> file://0006-detect-circular-dependencies.patch \
> file://0007-merge-newpkg-provides-even-when-oldpkg-provides-exis.patch \
> file://0008-select_higher_version.patch \
> + file://opkg-no-sync-offline.patch \
> "
>
> S = "${WORKDIR}/trunk"
> @@ -16,4 +17,4 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/trunk"
> SRCREV = "633"
> PV = "0.1.8+svnr${SRCPV}"
>
> -PR = "${INC_PR}.4"
> +PR = "${INC_PR}.5"
>
Merged into OE-Core (with additional PR bump)
Thanks
Sau!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-02 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-29 12:20 [PATCH] opkg: Don't call sync() when installing into an offline root Phil Blundell
2012-10-02 15:15 ` Saul Wold [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=506B04FE.1000502@linux.intel.com \
--to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=philb@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox