From: jhuang0 <jackie.huang@windriver.com>
To: "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ruby: Add from OE-Classic and update to 1.9.3-p194
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:46:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5074D388.6060008@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0LY9xi7=s0N1LX_zc9Hk3L1Wb15JRF4nN5sar8anjepJKA@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/9/2012 8:38 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 9 October 2012 11:38, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> * I sent this months ago but was told that oe-core is not the right place,
>>> however, we think it makes sense to add ruby to complete the scripting
>>> language set of: python, perl, ruby, so I re-send it.
>>
>> I have to say, my opinion is the same now as it was then. Ruby support is
>> certainly useful to have, and we have had requests for it; but unlike Perl and
>> Python which are needed by many other things, nothing we have in OE-Core
>> actually needs Ruby; thus it really belongs in another layer IMHO.
>
> Agreed. If we're completing the set of scripting languages there's
> plenty left out. A standalone meta-ruby layer that contains the
> runtime and pretty much every useful library sounds like a much better
> idea as the runtime and the libraries will be in a single place and
> incompatible changes can be done in a single move without having to
> co-ordinate multiple layers.
I see, thanks, so I think I should send it to meta-oe at this point.
Thanks,
Jackie
>
> Ross
>
--
Jackie Huang
WIND RIVER | China Development Center
MSN:jackielily@hotmail.com
Tel: +86 8477 8594
Mobile: +86 138 1027 4745
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-10 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-09 6:36 [PATCH 0/4] ruby: Add from OE-Classic and update to 1.9.3-p194 jackie.huang
2012-10-09 6:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] libyaml: Add recipe from meta-oe jackie.huang
2012-10-09 6:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] libyaml: update to 0.1.4 jackie.huang
2012-10-09 6:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] ruby: Add from OE-Classic jackie.huang
2012-10-09 6:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] ruby: update to 1.9.3-194 jackie.huang
2012-10-09 10:38 ` [PATCH 0/4] ruby: Add from OE-Classic and update to 1.9.3-p194 Paul Eggleton
2012-10-09 12:38 ` Burton, Ross
2012-10-10 1:46 ` jhuang0 [this message]
2012-10-09 17:07 ` Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5074D388.6060008@windriver.com \
--to=jackie.huang@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ross.burton@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox